The media in Germany and the leftist Vatican continue
to gloss over Pope Benedict being a theologian. No one mentions the deadly
Ratzinger Premise, which overturned traditional Catholic teachings for
political reasons.
A lay group of Ratzingerian and Lefebvrists who use
the fatal Ratzinger Premise, to destroy the Old Theology, met in Rome and
appealed to the College of Cardinals to elect a new pope. That pope will
probably use the same False Premise to put aside the pre-1949 Magisterium of
the Catholic Church.
The entire College of Cardinals today is interpreting Vatican
Council II irrationally and not rationally. It is over 10 years and no one has
contradicted me on this point.
Brother Alex Bugnolo has to appeal to the College of Cardinals to
interpret Vatican Council II rationally. Now they are dishonest and so are the
people protesting in Rome.
This group themselves need to give up their Ratzinger
and Lefebvrist carry over and interpret Vatican Council II rationally. They
need to announce that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to only
hypothetical cases. They are invisible people in 2023.
This is all they have to do. This is enough. The
inferences and conclusions will take the Catholic Church back to the Old
Theology, the old exclusivist ecclesiology, and there will not be any other
rational and honest option.
So the next pope will have to be a traditionalist and
so also the cardinals and bishops.
The group could contact the Italian Ministry for
External Affairs. Tell them to announce that all Catholics can only interpret Vatican
Council II rationally. So there will only be traditionalists. Ask them to
inform the Vatican.The Vatican must correct its mistake.
The solution for the problems in the Church is Vatican
Council II (rational). The crisis in the Church is caused by Vatican Council II
(irrational).
This group could contact the Armed Forces, the
carabinieri and police and confirm that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22
etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical and speculative cases in
2023. So there are no objective examples of salvation outside the Church. There
are no practical exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II for the Athanasius
Creed and Syllabus of Errors ( ecumenism of return etc). We are back to Tradition. The mainline Church returns to Tradition. Rome will have come back to the Faith, as Arbisbhop Marcel Lefebvre wanted. - Lionel Andrades
https://www.fromrome.info/2023/01/16/let-us-pray-for-the-successor-of-pope-benedict-xvi-who-is-about-to-be-elected/
https://www.fromrome.info/2023/01/17/il-solenne-avvertimento-al-collegio-cardinalizio/
_____________________________
JANUARY 15, 2023
FEBRUARY 5, 2020
FALSE PREMISE, INFERENCE AND CONCLUSION (GRAPHICS)
-Lionel Andrades
NOVEMBER 2, 2016
When an irrational premise is used I refer to it as Cushingism. When there is a rational premise, I refer to it as Feeneyism.
SUNDAY, AUGUST 22, 2021
The mainstream Church is liberal today because of the fake premise. Let them use a rational premise and the liberalism falls off from the whole Church
The mainstream Church is liberal today because of the fake premise. Let them use a rational premise and the liberalism falls off from the whole Church.
Fake premise
Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.
Rational Premise
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine
of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-
IRRATIONAL PREMISE
The irrational premise is that invisible things or persons are visible.
RATIONAL PREMISE
The rational premise is that invisible things or persons are visible.
_______________________
IRRATIONAL PREMISE
The irrational premise is that hypothetical cases are objectively visible in 2021.
RATIONAL PREMISE
The rational premise is that hypothetical cases are objectively invisible in 2021.
___________________________
IRRATIONAL PREMISE
The irrational premise is that the baptism of desire refers to personally known cases in 2021.
RATIONAL PREMISE
The rational premise is that the baptism of desire refers to an unknown cases in 2021.There is no personally known case.
__________________________
IRRATIONAL PREMISE
The irrational premise is assuming there are objectively seen and known cases of being saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in 2016.
RATIONAL PREMISE
The rational premise is assuming others (in general) cannot see invisible cases in the present and the past.It is assuming that the baptism of desire refers to an unknown and invisible case in the present or past.
When an irrational premise is used I refer to it as Cushingism.
When there is a rational premise, I refer to it as Feeneyism.Lionel Andrades
__________________________________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment