Why do we continue to have reports critical of Vatican Council II?

 

Why do we continue to have reports critical of Vatican Council II? We simply interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being hypothetical and speculative and the Council emerge traditional and ecclesiocentric.

Why must we speak of Ratzinger’s contribution at Vatican Council II when with the Rational Premise ( LG 16 refers to an invisible person in 1965-2023), Rational Inference ( invisible cases of LG 16 do not contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus) and Traditional Conclusion ( Vatican Council II is in harmony and not a break with the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition). This is the end of the liberal theology of Pope Benedict.

The leftist system, within and outside the Catholic Church, want us to believe that the Council is a break with Tradition. We cannot depend upon the popes, the CDF and the Vatican. They do not tell us the truth. They are not Magisterial when they choose an irrational and not rational premise. They oppose the Holy Spirit for political reasons.

The French Government for example, through schools and colleges is projecting Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition. Also all the religious communities in France, liberal and traditionalists are doing the same.

When the French media refer to traditionalists. These are Catholic religious communities and lay people, who reject Vatican Council II (irrational), as all Catholics should, and they go back to Tradition. But they do not know about Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.It does not contain any exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).-Lionel Andrades

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.

Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1

___________________