When the cardinals offer Holy Mass they are in a sense, not in the one, holy, Catholic and apostolic Church, since they interpret Vatican Council II etc irrationally and so change the understanding of the Creeds. This is a mortal sin in public.

 

When the cardinals offer Holy Mass they are in a sense, not in the one, holy, Catholic and apostolic Church, since they interpret Vatican Council II etc irrationally and so change the understanding of the Creeds. This is a mortal sin in public.

When Vatican Council II is interpreted irrationally and the conclusion is non-traditional we have the common liberalism. This liberalism brings disunity in the Church.There is division caused by Church doctrine and theology.There is a New Theology, New Ecumenism, New Evangelization and New Ecclesiology.All this is produced with the Council interpreted irrationally.

When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally i.e. LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are only hypothetical and invisible cases in the present times (1965-2023) the Church returns to the one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, outside of which there is no salvation. We return to the old morals, faith, mission and ecclesiology. There is no more division in the Catholic Church. Automatically we are back to the past.There is only Tradition with no liberalism. So it is necessary that cardinals announce that they will interpret LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, rationally. They must announce that LG 8 etc are only hypothetical cases. They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church in 1949-2023.

Not only are the cardinals interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally. This mistake has spread throughout the world. Even non Catholics in schools and universities are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. The error has spread in and outside the Catholic Church.

Inter-religious dialogue and ecumenism have their theological foundation in Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.

All the universities only interpret the Council irrationally and not rationally and consider this scholarship in research. They grant doctoral academic degrees to students who have their theological foundation in Vatican Council II interpreted with the common fake premise and nontraditional conclusion.

All this has to be changed immediately by interpreting the Council rationally and so returning to Tradition. The mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (CDF) to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney must also be acknowledged. - Lionel Andrades