When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally it is the progressivist/liberals who will be outside the Church and the orthodox Catholics at the center. Even conservatives like Cardinal Gerhard Muller who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, will be outside the Church.Cardinals who are liberals today and who in future will interpret the Council rationally, will be within the Church.

When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally it is the progressivists/liberals who will be outside the Church and the orthodox Catholics at the center. Even conservatives like Cardinal Gerhard Muller who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, will be outside the Church. Cardinals who are liberals today and who in future will interpret the Council rationally, will be within the Church.

Those who will be within the Church will be interpreting LG 8, LG 14, LG 15, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being only hypothetical cases.

So it would mean many now seemingly liberal cardinals would choose to be rational and so stay within the Church. Orthodoxy would depend upon seeing LG 8, 14, 15 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as not being a break with Tradition but a continuation of the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. This would be the rational, traditional and orthodox option for the cardinals.

The Ratzinger, Fringe, Ottaviani, Kung, Congar, Balthazar, Murray, Dietrich Von Hildebrand, Michael Davies, Marcel Lefebvre, Roberto dei Mattei and Romano Amerio way of reasoning will be over.

When Pope Francis and the cardinals interpret LG 8, 14, 15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22  etc as being physically invisible cases in 1965-2023, they automatically become orthodox on the issue of salvation, mission, inter-faith dialogue, ecumenism, matrimony, faith and morals, the non separation of Church and State and the rest of the past ecclesiology.

We will not need the Latin Mass to go back to Tradition. The Church will be traditional at even the Novus Ordo Mass and in other Rites.

So the 21 new cardinals who will be appointed in September 2023 can no more interpret LG 8, 14, 15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being exceptions for the strict, traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. If they did continue to do so they would be irrational and so dishonest.

The 18 of the 21- September cardinals, who will be papal electors, cannot in good conscious, interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, as before. Since the people now know that there is a rational, honest and traditional choice. So the future pope must be honest.

Rome comes back to the Faith as it was desired by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. The SSPX bishops simply have to interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc rationally and they stay with Tradition.

We have a new discovery in the Church. It is not new, in the sense, that it was always there. We now know that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II.One is rational and the other is irrational.Either way, they affect our understanding of the Creeds, Councils, Catechisms and dogma EENS. 

So there are two interpretations of the Creeds, Councils, Catechisms and dogma EENS, one is rational and the other irrational. Now they are being wrongly interpreted with the irrational premise (invisible people are visible in 2023), the irrational inference (invisible cases referred to in Lumen Gentium 8,14, 15,16 etc,are visible in the present times).Unknowingly most Catholics are presently using the Irrational Premise (LG 16 refers to a physically visible person in the present times). So they conclude wrongly that since there is known salvation outside the Church in the present times.This makes the dogma EENS, the past ecclesiocentrism and the rest of Tradition obsolete. The Council becomes ‘a new revelation’ or ‘a revolution’ in the Church. This is the Reuters, Associated Press and New York Times interpretation of Vatican Council II. This is the Jesuit version of the Council.

The ball is now in the court of the SSPX since they have always been following Tradition but had interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally and also rejected it. They simply have to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and accept it. The Council is in harmony with the ecclesiology of the old Roman Missal.

The SSPX are back at the center of the Church as the liberals fade out with no theological support in Vatican Council II.

The theological axis of the Church has shifted from a liberal Vatican to an orthodox Albano, Italy and Econe, Switzerland. Tradition has come back home. The pope can no more ask the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II. It is the SSPX which asks the pope to accept Vatican Council II.

Fr.Davide Pagliarani, the Superior of the SSPX and Pope Francis has to adapt to the new understanding of Vatican Council II. Vatican Council II in 2023 is different from that in 1965.

The Catholic Church will once again have unity in theology and doctrine. The theological liberalism will end.

If Pope Francis cannot interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so ethically, he is not eligible to be the pope.

It has to be seen how bishops like Bruno Forte and Georg Batzing respond. Will they accept the traditional interpretation of Vatican Council II or make this a political issue. Throughout the pontificate of Pope Francis this new discovery was there on the Internet, but it was ignored.

The Synods are 'null and void', they are not magisterial or apostolic, when the participants and voters, interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and dishonestly.

The Ministry of Education in Italy and those in other countries must be asked to interpret Vatican Council only rationally and so honestly. It would be the same for the Foreign Ministry of Italy and the Vatican, the Interior Ministry in Italy etc.

Traditionis Custode and Amoris Laetitia are not binding since Pope Francis issued them with Vatican Council II interpreted dishonestly. Future encyclicals cannot support liberalism based upon the now old interpretation of Vatican Council II.

Alberto Melloni and Massimo Faggioli at the Bologna School (FSCIRE) now have a decadent interpretation of the Council. The Church has moved forward. The Italian Government must not fund the FSCIRE when they continue to interpret Vatican Council II dishonestly.

The Catholic Church has returned to it historical roots. The proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics is supported by traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II, intepreted only  rational. It is because there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church and in Heaven there are only Catholics, governments must be Catholic.In this way Governements can help to not go to Hell. Catholics are the new people of God (Nostra Aetate 4, Vatican Council II).         -Lionel Andrades