eucharistandmission: All the popes from John XIII have been promoting a heretical theology at Vatican Council II says Mons. Antonio Livi . He does not say that without a false premise the theology changes and then Vatican Council II automatically has the Old Theology and Old Ecclesiolgy.

Thursday, May 3, 2018

All the popes from John XIII have been promoting a heretical theology at Vatican Council II says Mons. Antonio Livi . He does not say that without a false premise the theology changes and then Vatican Council II automatically has the Old Theology and Old Ecclesiolgy.

All the popes from John XIII have been promoting a heretical theology at Vatican Council II says Mons. Antonio Livi .But many know this. He does not say that without a false premise the theology changes and then Vatican Council II automatically has the Old Theology and Old Ecclesiolgy. This point is still known and explained only on this blog Eucharist and Mission(Lionel's Blog).It is still unknown to Mons. Livi.

In an interview with Gloria TV in Italian he has said that all the popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith have taught orthodoxy and sacredness but they have all been united on theology.A heretical theology.

He said Pope Benedict has good intentions and pastorally has done good but has made philosophical and theological mistakes.Antonio Livi still is not aware of the precise and subtle error in the rejection of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with the invisible people are visible premise.

He observes the effects of the use of the wrong premise in Vatican Council II but still is not aware of the precise cause of these non traditional conclusions. It is assuming invisible for us baptism of desire etc are visible and known examples of salvation outside the Church.This is irrational and an innovation in the Church.This error was not made by the Church Fathers, St. Thomas Aquinas etc. For them invisible cases of the baptism of desire were also referred to unknown people and so they were never relevant to extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The liberal theologians, Rahner etc made them relevant with the use of this false premise( invisible cases are real people saved outside the Church)

Like Romano Amero, Msgr. Brunero Gherardino and Mons. Lefebvre he is not aware that the error emerged during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII and Monsgr.Livi himself makes the same mistake.

Otherwise he would have outright have said that Vatican Council II is in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiolgy of the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades