Sunday, June 10, 2018

John Lamont and Joseph Shaw prepare to talk at the June 23 Lepanto Foundation conference in Rome with their politically correct Cushingite theology, which will preserve their careers and lifestyle and they will get away with it to come back next year

John Lamont and Joseph Shaw prepare to talk at the June 23 Lepanto Foundation conference in Rome with their politically correct Cushingite theology, which will preserve their careers and lifestyle  and they will get away with it. Then they will come back the next year (2019) to repeat the same deception in their interpretation of magisterial documents, especially Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

John Lamont will speak on the New Theology this June 23.He will not mention that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the New Theology.Then there will be no break with the dogma EENS, the past ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors.But the Left will object.
The have been invited by Prof.Roberto dei Mattei of the Lepanto Foundation who has written books on Vatican Council II interpreted with irrational Cushingite theology. He did not know that Vatican Council II could be interpreted with Feeneyism. Now that he knows, he still will not affirm EENS ( Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II (Cushingite). He too is politically correct with the Left and the Vatican.
This will be another deceptive conference held by the traditionalists.

The speakers will interpret Vatican Council II, as do the liberals, then they will go away, knowing that there is no controversy .No one is on to them, nobody is objecting.
If they interpreted Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical and not objectively seen in 2018, there would be no examples of known salvation outside the Church for them. But then there would be objections from the Left and the Vatican.Since they would be affirming Feeneyite EENS and the past exclusivist ecclesiology. Since they would be saying that Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation and so all non Catholic die without Catholic Faith and so are oriented to Hell. 

They would also be saying that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases, invisible people in 2018.So they are not exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 which tells us that all need 'faith and baptism' for salvation.This would be an interpretation of Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of continuity with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors. So theologically there would be no place any more for the New Ecumenism, New Evangelisation, New Ecclesiology and New Canon Law based on visible for us baptism of desire etc.

The speakers would be saying that all Jews,Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus etc and Orthodox  Christians, Protestants,Evangelicals etc  are Hell- bound in 2018.Since they do not enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism. Jesus is necessary for salvation and so is membership in the Catholic Church. It is no more Jesus without the Church.
This is hard for them.
So they have another one of their superficial conferences with speakers approved by the Left.
The traditionalist Catholics like the liberals are denying the Catholic Faith even after being informed.They are part of the apostasy. They are prudent in a worldly sense.

John Lamont is not expected to say anything new on June 23,2018. He needs the mandatam to teach theology in Australia from the Cushingite bishops there.It is the same with Joseph Shaw who teaches Philosophy at leftist Oxford University,U.K.
Shaw attends the Latin Mass with the New Ecclesiology, which is a rupture with that of the missionaries in the 16th century, when they offered the Tridentine Rite Mass.He is going to continue with the deception, another year.

Prof. Thomas Pink, professor of theology Kings College London has not been invited to this conference. He was interviewed by Michael Matt at another conference some time back, when he maintained his prudent approach.He did not say anything specific. They all act as if they do not know about Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).Michael Matt at the Remant also does not want to go into the catacombs, just yet.

Prof. Thomas Pink wants to continue with his teaching job and not be called a bigot etc.He does not want it to be konwn that he supports the teachings of the Catholic Church and interprets Vatican Council II in line with the Magisterium of the 16th century.Shaw wants the approval of Ecclesia Dei for his Latin Mass Society in England  and Una Voce.

Roberto dei Mattei's Lepanto Foundation has received the funds to organize this conference and he is not going to affirm EENS or Vatican Council II with Feeneyism in spite of so many reports online on this subject, some mentioning him specifically.
Catholics have to proclaim heresy as orthodoxy, as the two popes want it, and the speakers are going to go along with it since it is in their personal interest.

Canon lawyers must appeal against Joseph Shaw, John Lamoent and Thomad Pink teaching theolgy with deception. They use a false premise to create a rupture with EENS (Feeneyite) and the past ecclesiology which they do not affirm as Catholics.
-Lionel Andrades

JULY 16, 2016

Even Catholic traditionalists like John Lamont. Joseph Shaw and Thomas Pink will not interpret Vatican Council II rationally, that is hypothetical cases not being explicit in 2016. Since there will be political and social repercussion which will affect their careers as professors

JULY 12, 2016

Joseph Shaw, John Lament and Thomas Pink teach the new theology which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.They remain politically correct with the bishops to keep their mandatum to teach theology

The Latin Mass Society is part of the Establishment which does not affirm traditional doctrine,ecclesiology and interprets Vatican Council II with an irrationality which is politically correct

JULY 10, 2015
Pope Francis permits the Traditional Latin Mass only with the new ecclesiology and compromise : Joseph Shaw looks the other way

May 24, 2014 

Traditionalists do not want to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Another wasted conference in England today

JULY 11, 2016
Fr.Serafino Lanzetta and Joseph Shaw need to correct themself and then they will have a new perspective on the Council : new theology violates the Principle of Non Contradiction

MARCH 16, 2016

Joseph Shaw removes comments: John Lamont prudently avoids the issue

MARCH 11, 2016

Is not the theology taught by Dr.John Lamont in Australia approved by the Masons ?

Even Tom Mohniyan's Ave Maria University adhere's fully to Ex Corde Ecclesiae and interprets Vatican Counncil II with a false premise

John Lamont, Thomas Pink, Joseph Shaw remain politically correct and keep their mandatum to teach theology

Joseph Shaw is not going to tell Muslims at Oxford that the Chuch says all need to formally enter the Church to avoid Hell. Neither is Gavin D'Costa going to say this in Bristol.

Joseph Shaw would not say that all need to formally enter the Church for salvation in Britain. This would be the old ecclesiology.Instead he would say that there are exceptions. This is the new ecclesiology.

Ecclesiology is not changed with I.I and BOD.It never was.Vatican Council II was always orthodox on salvation.The ecclesiology was exclusivist

No text in Quanto Conficiamur Moerore or the Council of Trent says there are exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Department of Theology and Religious Studies at the University of Bristol is still teaching an irrationality : even after being informed
May 31, 2014
Joseph Shaw, Gavin D'Costa obedient to Cardinal Vince Nicols are misleading lay Catholics

May 13, 2014
Orthodox Catholics have no comments on the University of Bristol video

Exclusivist ecclesiology?
The new theology is based on being able to see the dead. Remove the premise, which is, "I can see the dead on earth".We then have the old ecclesiology, the exclusivist ecclesiology. The ecclesiology of Vatican Council II is exclusivist. Since it affirms the rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in Ad Gentes 7, which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.LG 16,LG 8,UR 3,NA 2 etc are not known exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 or the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. We are left with the old ecclesiology.

Who agrees with you?
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson says Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.

 Implicit intention, invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) in Vatican Council II do not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus –John Martigioni

JUNE 9, 2018
Lepanto Foundation conference this month in Rome is expected to be another non committal, prudent meeting among friends : the real problem and its solution is too sensitive for them to discuss and proclaim

JUNE 9, 2018

Speakers at the Lepanto Foundation conference in Rome on June 23 do not know that there is a mistake in Lumen Gentium 14,Vatican Council II.They should be discussing it
JUNE 10, 2018
So is the Lepanto Foundation using irrational Cushingism or traditional Feeneyism at the June 23 conference to interpret magisterial documents? We know the answer. Traditionalists are Cushingites on Vatican Council II

MAY 27, 2018

Liberals cannot criticize Cardinal Raymond Burke since he accepts Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite),in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite),the Syllabus of Errors,an ecumenism and the Social Reign of Christ the King : traditionalists at conf. next month support the New Theology
OCTOBER 15, 2017
We are in the same Church but the Polish bishops interpret the Nicene Creed, EENS, Vatican Council II and the Catechism differently

JUNE 3, 2018  This is the ecclesiology Bishop Athanasius Schneider will not proclaim in public to the Kazakh people.It is physically safe out there to be a Cushingite

JUNE 2, 2018
Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma - Hardcover (Dark Navy Leather)
Ludwig Ott is in a rupture with the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century and Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441
 MAY 27, 2018
Cardinal Burke has set a new theological and doctrinal model for sedevacantists and traditionalists.They can affirm tradition and Vatican Council II(Feeneyite). He indicates liberals can no more cite Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition, by using a false premise
MAY 27, 2018
Things couldn't be better for Cardinal Raymond Burke
MAY 27, 2018
Liberals cannot criticize Cardinal Raymond Burke since he accepts Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite),in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite),the Syllabus of Errors, an ecumenism and the Social Reign of Christ the King : traditionalists at conf. next month support the New Theology

Feeneyism (108)
Feeneyism is the missing link (9)
Feeneyism on Wikipedia (12)
Feeneyism.Cushingism (7)
Feeneyismo (9)
Feeneyite Catechism of the Catholic 
Church 1995 (2)
Feeneyite Catholic College (1)
Feeneyite EENS (1)
Feeneyite EENS Vatican Council II
(Feeneyite) (4)
Feeneyite Theology (1)
Feeneyite Vatican Council II (1)
Feeneyite-Cushingite Model (1)
Feeneyites (4)
Feeneyites were always correct (1)
Cushing Additions (2)
Cushing heresy (5)
Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error (22)
Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error Examples 
in Vatican Council II (25)
Cushingism (114)
Cushingism and the Catholic popes(7)
Cushingism in Vatican Council II (17)
Cushingismo (6)
Cushingite (3)
Cushingite Bishops (1)
Cushingite Theology (6)
Cushingites (1)
Cushingites must make the correction(1)

False premise (19)
False premise in Vatican Council II(80)
False reasoning from the Letter is all over 
Vatican Council II: Abp Lefebvre did not notice it - 1 (5)
False reasoning from the Letter is all over Vatican Council II: Abp Lefebvre did not notice it -2 (2)
False reasoning from the Letter is all over Vatican Council II: Abp Lefebvre did not notice it - 1 (2)
False reasoning from the Letter is all over Vatican Council II: Abp Lefebvre did not notice it -3 (7)
False Theology (3)
Vatican Council (Feeneyite) (1)
Vatican Council has passages which support EENS and no passages which contradict EENS (1)
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) (4)
Vatican Council II (Feeenyite) (6)
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) (1)
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) in harmony with EENS(Feeneyite) (1)
Vatican Council II Feeneyite (8)
Vatican Council II is Feeneyite (11)
Vatican Council II is Feeneyite for me.(1)
Vatican Council II( premise free) (2)
Vatican Council II ( premise-free) (1)
Vatican Council II(premise free) (2)
Vatican Council II(premise-free) (6)
Vatican Council II (premise-free) (9)
Vatican Council II/Feeneyite) (1)

Exclusive salvation (8)
exclusivist and traditional (1)
Exclusivist ecclesiocentrism (1)

Vatican Council II (Cushingite) (6)
Vatican Council II Cushigite (1)
Vatican Council II Cushingite (4)
Vatican Council II(Cushingite). (7)
Cushing Additions (2)
Cushing heresy (5)
Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error (22)
Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error Examples in Vatican Council II (25)
Cushingism (115)
Cushingism and the Catholic popes(7)
Cushingism in Vatican Council II (17)
Cushingismo (6)
Cushingite (3)
Cushingite Bishops (1)
Cushingite Theology (6)
Cushingite Vatican Council II (1)
Cushingites (1)
Cushingites must make the correction(1)

Catechism of the Catholic 

Church (Feeneyite) (2)
Catchechisms for me are
 Feeneyite (1)
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite) (2)

I accept (4)
I agree (4)
I am a Feeneyite who does not reject BOD (1)
I am a Feeneyite who does not reject Vatican Council II (1)
I am saying all who are in Heaven are there with the baptism of water in the Catholic Church this is the teaching of the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries. (1)

Cardinal Burke: False religions that permit abortion should be suppressed

Repost : Even members of the Lay Movements in the Catholic Church can proclaim the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King

TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018

Repost : The beauty of the Catholic Church is not there in any other religion says a Catholic priest.There cannot be Christ without the Catholic Church
MAY 22, 2018
Repost : Catholic political party needed in England

TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018

Repost : "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018" nor " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases " so Vatican Council II does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors (Graphics)

Cardinal Raymond Burke could meet the leaders of Forza Nuova and Militia Christi in Italy just as he met Matteo Salvini : Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation could be explained

MAY 23, 2018
Left and right schism

MAY 23, 2018

In a secular state which allows freedom of religion there could be pro-Catholic political parties, supporting the faith and moral teachings of the Catholic Church, and affirming in their manifesto the Social Reign of Christ the King

THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018
Cardinal Burke's reference to false religions not being paths to salvation is from Vatican Council II

THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018
Cardinal Raymond Burke contradicts Cardinal Luiz Ladaria's heretical statement : interprets Lumen Gentium 8 rationally and traditionally

 MAY 24, 2018

Cardinal Burke has affirmed the exclusive understanding of salvation and also Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) : it supports the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King
 THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018
Cardinal Raymond Burke has set an example for Catholics in general and traditionalists in particular since he has affirmed what I call Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and rejected Vatican Council II (Cushingite)

Feeneyism: It is the old theology and   philosophical reaoning which says  there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypotheticalbut objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case 
of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but 
dies before he receives it and is saved.
 Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS.
Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is a visible case or the SSPX it is relevant to the dogma EENS.
Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.
Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS itis assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational.
Council of Florence: One of the three Councils which defined the
 dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.It did not mention
 the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.
Liberal theologians: They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in
 the present times.They use Cushingism.
Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism.
LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.
LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council
 II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching  on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston: It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times.
 So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant 
to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.It was Cushingite.
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite). It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part,only .It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions.
Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite). It is based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as 
being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter.

Baltimore Catechism: It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.It can be
 interpreted withCushingism or Feeneyism.
Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) ; It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.This is a Cushingite interpretation.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.It is Feeneyite.
New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.
With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.It's basis is Cushingism.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): .It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.
There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell.
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. 
Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite): CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to the Sacraments.When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through
 Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin to formally enter the Church.
CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvatioon.


Six of Pasqualucci's 'distinct points of rupture with the Tradition of the Church in the texts of the Vatican II documents' are not a rupture.The other points are open to interpretation and traditionalists do not agree among themselves.

But the six points are clear objective errors of Pasqualucci, Amerio and Gheradini. It is the same error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II made by Archbishop Lefebvre, Bishop Bernard Fellay and the other SSPX bishops, Christopher Ferrara, Roberto dei Mattei and the late Fr. Nicholas Gruner and John Vennari.-Lionel Andrades

APRIL 15, 2018
Image result for Paolo Pasqualucci PhotosImage result for Romano Amerio PhotosImage result for Msgr. Brunero Gherardini  Photos
The interpretation of Paolo Pasqualucci, Romano Amerio and Msgr. Brunero Gherardini is irrational it can be seen in the text of the blog 1Peter5 : They misinterpreted hypothetical cases in Lumen Gentium, Unitatitis Redintegratio and Nostra Aetate as being objective people saved outside the Church.This was a mistake

FEBRUARY 5, 2018

JUNE 18, 2014
Cristina Siccardi ,Paolo Pasqualucci use the irrational inference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II

APRIL 6, 2018
Image result for Photo of Cardinal Caffarra

APRIL 4, 2018
There will be a false Profession of Faith at the Conference this Saturday in Rome

APRIL 5, 2018
Conferences must criticize the March 1 and 30th statements of Cardinals Ladaria and Nicols : affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, there are billions of non Catholics in Hell today.It is important to be a Catholic and to follow the teachings of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell

APRIL 5, 2018
St.Benedict Centers need to correct their position on Vatican Council II with reference to EENS

APRIL 25, 2018

MARCH 8, 2018
Image result for Press Conference on Thursday Placuit Deo Photo

MAY 31, 2018


-Lionel Andrades

No comments: