The Angelus Press, Michael Matt and James Vogel need to admit to admit and apologize for the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). They also slandered Fr. Leonard Feeney. Even the books of Archbishop Lefebvre published by Angelus Press interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create an artifical and politically rupture with Tradition.
Michael Matt now editor in chief of Remnant News was formerly employed at Angelus Press it was reported.
Angelus Press owned by the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) has published a book Roberto dei Mattei's book on Vatican Council II.He mistakenly interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise and then criticized the Council. He did not interpret the Council without the error and so affirm Feeneyite EENS and the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
The same mistake was made by Fr. Francois Laisney critical of Fr. Leonard Feeney and published by Angelus Press.
Fr. Laisney interprets the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) as exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.He also interprets LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II as being exceptions to EENS. In other words unknown people are known, invisible cases are visible and what is hypothetical and theoretical is objective for him. Upon this philosophical observation his new theology is outside the Church there is salvation.
Fr. Laisney book, Is Feeneyism Catholic? superficially and irrationally interprets BOD, BOB and I.I and Vatican Council and then slanders Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Centers in the USA.
The SSPX website also has a section, Feeneyism .They have accepted the bad reasoning of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO).The same error was made by Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII. Then the popes from Paul VI repeated it on Vatican Council II.
Angelus Press and the SSPX's philosophical and theological position on Vatican Council II, EENS, LOHO, Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Centers in the USA are the same as that of the publishers of Cardinal Martini and Cardinal Kasper.
The recent book of Bishop Athanasius Schneider in conversation with Diane Montagna has the same factual mistake.Schneider and Montagna's interpretation of Vatican Council II is Cushingite.
Bishop Schneider, Diane Montagna and Michael Matt ignored so many reports on line which specifically correct bishop Schneider, a Cushingite like the SSPX bishops and Archbishop Lefebvre.
At the Angelus, Catholic Identity and Lake Garda conferences speakers also do not affirm EENS ( Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
We now know that unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I cannot be known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.They are not objective cases but the Lefebrists cannot reconcile themselves to this.
Fr. Leonard Feeney was not obliged to assume BOD, BOB and I.I were literal cases, in the present times.He was not obligated to assume BOD, BOB and I.I were physical bodies in real time, in Newtons time and space on earth.
Angelus Press has published 'Is Feeneyism Catholic' by Fr.Francois Laisney and the Second Vatican Council II and Unwritten Story by Roberto dei Mattei,based on a factual and objective error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents.
They need to admit it.-Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 24, 2020
JANUARY 25, 2020
Diane Montagna's recent book referring to Vatican Council II, published by Amazon has an objective error. Along with Bishop Athanasius Schneider she interprets Vatican Council II irrationally in spite of there being so many reports on line which correct the error.March 1, 2019
Michael Matt needs to change and not Brother Andre Marie MICM : Remnant News is as obsolete as CDF's Morandi and Di Noia
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/03/michael-matt-needs-to-change-and-not.html
________________________________________
Their false premise is:-
1. Invisible people are visible.
2.Unknown case of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known.
3.The
unknown case of the catechumen who desired the baptism of water but
dies before he received it and is saved, is a personally known person.
4.There is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for us human beings.
5.We can see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.
6.We can physically see non Catholics in Heaven and on earth who are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).
7.There are non Catholics who are dead- men visible and walking who are saved outside the Church.
8.There are known people in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own, who are saved.
9.There are some Anglicans and Protestants whom we know who are going to Heaven even though they are outside the Catholic Church.
10.There are some non Catholics whom we know, who are dead, and now are in Heaven, even though they were not Catholic.
With the false premise there are 'objective exceptions' to EENS. There are visible exceptions to the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed is changed, there is a new understanding of the Nicene Creed etc :-
1. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is contradicted.
2. The Nicene Creed in which we say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' over
the centuries referred to only one known baptism, the baptism of
water.The baptism of desire etc cannot be given to someone like the
baptism of water.But now the understanding is ' I believe in three or
more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire,blood and
ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic
Church'.
3. The
Apostles Creed says ' we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic
Church'. Over the centuries it was understood that the Holy Spirit
guided the Catholic Church and taught that there was no salvation
outside the Church.Now unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism
of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, and LG 8, UR 3, NA2,
GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are assumd to be objective examples of
salvation outside the Church.
4.In the past three Church Councils defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)
in the extraordinary Magisterium .It was an 'infallible teaching' for
Pope Pius X( Letter of the Holy Offie 1949).Now it is obsolete with
their being alleged known salvation outside the Church.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
6.With
the false premise the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradict itself. It
affirms the strict interpretation of EENS while invincible invincible
ignorance is intepreted as referring to personally known non Catholics
saved outside the Chuch.Invincible ignorance is not seen as a
hypothetical case only.
7.Redemptoris
Missio, Dominus Iesus, Ecclesia in Asia, Balamand Declaration etc were
all written upholding the false premise. They did not support exclusive
salvation in the Catholic Church. So in a subtle way they contradicted
EENS(Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed etc. They did not support the past
ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.They are Christological without
the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. It's Christ without the
necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.8. Traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the Church.
9.Inter faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/cardinal-reinhold-marx-of-munich.html
July 8, 2018
Internet links on Fr. Leonard Feeney really condemn him for not using Cushingism as a philosophy and theology
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/iinternet-links-on-fr-leonard-feeney.html
When are traditionalists going to get rid of their smugness on doctrine and theology ? : Catholic Identity Conference
https://gloria.tv/post/VAyBudS3Bbwi3YvundbV8jDUA
https://contactout.com/James-Vogel-2150527
https://angeluspress.org/
https://sspx.org/en/publications/newsletters/angelus-press-provides-arms-in-time-of-war-appeal-letter
June 27, 2019
Feeneyites affirm outside the Church there is no salvation based upon Vatican Council II and hypothetical baptism of desire which is not a practical exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). They do not reject the baptism of desire but reject it being an exception to the dogma EENS.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/feeneyites-affirm-outside-church-there.html
July 22, 2019
Fr.Francois Laisney interprets Vatican Council II and LOHO with Cushingism. This creates a rupture with Tradition(EENS etc ( Graphics)
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/frfrancois-laisney-interprets-vatican.html
________________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment