We have new information and it is here only on this blog

We  have new information and it is here only on this blog.

1.The hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition depends upon the false premise and not Vatican Council II itself.

2.Irrespective if you are a conservative or liberal Catholic, if you use the false premise there is a rupture with Tradition.

3.If you are a liberal Catholic and do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you become a traditionalist who can affirm the stict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

4. If you are a traditionalist and you do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you can easily become a Feeneyite.

5. So irrespective of the Rite of the Mass, Latin or Novus Ordo, if you interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise you can easily become a traditionalist or conservative Catholic, affirming exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church with Traditional Catholic Mission. -Lionel Andrades

 DECEMBER 10, 2020

Choose your approach to Vatican Council II

 

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/choose-your-approach-to-vatican-council.html

DECEMBER 10, 2020

I interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as being invisible and not visible, unknown and not known, subjective and not objective, implicit and not explicit,theoretical and not practically known, hypothetical and not seen in the flesh, speculative and not a sold body in Newton's time and space.I am not a modernist. There is nothing in the entire text of Lumen Gentium, Unitatatis Redintigratio, Ad Gentes and Nostra Aetate to contradict the strict interpretation of EENS for me

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/i-interpret-lg-8-lg-14-lg-16-ur-3-na-2.html