When Massimo Faggioli who considered himself a specialist on Vatican Council II cannot reject Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise , it indicates that the progressivist-conservative division in the Church has taken a jolt.

 When Massimo Faggioli who considered himself a specialist on Vatican Council II cannot reject Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise , it indicates that the progressivist-conservative division in the Church has taken a jolt.Over time the whole Church will choose the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.

Those who do not accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, will be schismatic and heretical.They will be in schism with the past Magisterium and the present two popes. They will be accepting an innovation with the false premise.

Presently the two popes, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Vatican offices are choosing the schismatic interpretation of Vatican Council II.- Lionel Andrades

____________

 FEBRUARY 15, 2021

Massimo Faggioli, John Allen , Michael Sean Winters and Joshua Elwee have all become Feeneyites. They know that this is the result when they interpret Vatican Council II rationally, without the common false premise.

 Massimo Faggioli, John Allen , Michael Sean Winters and Joshua Elwee have all become Feeneyites. They know that this is the result when they interpret Vatican Council II rationally, without the common false premise.

Massimo Faggioli once described himself as a specialist on Vatican Council II. Theologically he specializes on Vatican Council II. 

The specialist on Vatican Council II is now intepreting the Council as a break with the 55 tear old interpretation of the Council. - Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/massimo-faggioli-john-allen-michael.html

_________________

FEBRUARY 14, 2021

Massimo Faggioli needs to clarify that Vatican Council II does not contradict Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc) for him any more

 Massimo Faggioli needs to clarify for all that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases only in 1965-2021.

Similarly he needs to clarify that for him LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are also only hypothetical and  speculative cases in the present times. So there are no objective exceptions , mentioned in Vatican Council II, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Jesuits in the Middle Ages. There are no objective exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church to the Syllabus of Errors. 

So for him the Ccuncil does not contradict Tradition any more.

It does not contradict Feeneyite EENS of the St.Benedict Center, New Hampshire. It does not contradict EENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston whose excommunication was lifted by that great exponent of Vatican Council II, Pope Paul VI.The Jesuit priest only had to recite the Athanasius Creed, which says outside the Church there is no salvation.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/massimo-faggioli-needs-to-clarify-that.html

FEBRUARY 14, 2021

Massimo Faggioli knows that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with or without the false premise and the conclusion will be non traditional or traditional, in a rupture or in harmony, with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the Magisterium of the 16th century. So he now chooses to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. He is a full Professor of Theology and Religious Studies at Villanova University, USA and needs to inform them and the organisations he is associated with, of his new understanding of Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/massimo-faggioli-knows-that-vatican.html