Fr.Davide Pagliarani and Pope Francis interpret Vatican Council II with a fake premise and so do not offend the Left. But it means that they are rejecting EENS ( with no exceptions) and the Syllabus of Errors ( with no exceptions). This is understandable for the liberals but Fr. Pagliarani and the SSPX bishops and priests, are rejecting Tradition

 

When Fr.Davide Pagliariani, Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) issued a statement on Traditionis Custode he prudently did not mention the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He listed  other beliefs promoted by the SSPX but did not refer to outside the Church there is no salvation.

Inspite of so many reports on the Internet over more than eight years on this subject, he did not say that Vatican Council II was not in conflict with the dogma EENS.

Why ? Since he did not want to affirm EENS with no exceptions ?He did not want to affirm the Syllabus of Errors  with no exceptions?.Now he affirms outside the Church there is no salvation but with exceptions.The liberals and the ecclesiastics do the same and it is approved by the Left.

Fr.Davide Pagliarani and Pope Francis interpret Vatican Council II with a fake premise and so do not offend the Left. But it means that they are rejecting EENS ( with no exceptions) and the Syllabus of Errors ( with no exceptions). This is understandable for the liberals  but Fr. Pagliarani and the SSPX bishops and priests, are rejecting Tradition. –Lionel Andrades