Without
the irrational premise, there would be no theological basis for the New
Ecumenism and his Christology would have to be accompabied with the traditional ecclesiocentrism
of the Catholic Church.
Some time back he wrote an article on The Four Marks of the Church without knowing that there is a rational and irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and so the conclusion of both would be different.
With
or without the false premise we create a non traditional or traditional conclusion.So it could mean
that the Four Marks of the Church would be there in a Vatican Council II, with
or without the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.
Cardinal
Walter Kasper could affirm the Four
Marks of the Church ( one, holy, Catholic and apostolic) but for me the Council can only be interpreted with the rational
premise.So there is no break with Tradition.I would affirm a
Christocentrism along with traditional ecclesiocentrism and still support the Four Marks of
the Church.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment