Pope Francis and the traditionalists are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a break with Tradition

Pope Francis and the traditionalists are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a break with Tradition so they all reject the Athanasius Creed ( with no exceptions),the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius ( with no exceptions ) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (with the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance not being exceptions).

The SSPX and the liberals affirm these three documents but with exceptions,while the present two popes reject them completely.

The St.Benedict Center(SBC) affirms EENS with no exceptions but interprets Vatican Council II  as having exceptions for EENS, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed.

All three groups  use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II. Without the fake premise they would have to affirm EENS, Athanasius Creed and Syllabus of Errors, with no exceptions.

Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider do not affirm these three documents  with no exceptions.Since hypothetical cases of LG 16 (invincible ignorance)  are practical exceptions for them, for these three documents. Even  when the popes and saints over history refer to the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance , the SSPX and the liberals , re-interpret  these cases with the false premise and then project them as exceptions to exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. Invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are projected as being physically visible. So Pope Francis and the traditionalists are interpreting Vatican Council II, irrationally, heretically and schismatically. -Lionel Andrades

-Lionel Andrades