I go for the SSPX Mass in Latin and I don't interpret Vatican Council II like Bishop Bernard Fellay and Fr. Davide Pagliarani

 

We now know that the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO) was ‘a fake product’. This changes the interpretation of Vatican Council II. We are not obliged to follow the irrationality of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), Vatican, in 1949 and also today (2023).

I can go for the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) Mass in Latin in Rome and affirm Vatican Council II (rational i.e. LG 8, 14 and 16 are hypothetical cases only).

I can affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and also hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I).

I do not have to reject the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) which are not contradicted by Vatican Council II (rational).

I don’t have to interpret Vatican Council II like Bishop Bernard Fellay and Fr.David Pagliarani. The interpretation of the Council is independent of the Mass, in Latin or the vernacular.

For me the Council of Florence which defined EENS is not contradicted by the Catechism of the Catholic Church. This Catechism of Pope John Paul II also does not contradict the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q).

I stay clear of the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII and Cardinal Richard Cushing, while the rest of the Catholic Church follow it today.

Vatican Council II, for me, is Feeneyite. It supports Feeneyite EENS, according to the St. Benedict Centers in New Hampshire and Massachusetts, USA.

The Decree of Prohibitions of the CDF against the St. Benedict Center, NH, was based upon the fake interpretation of Vatican Council II and the 1949 LOHO. Even from a secular point of view in the USA, it is unethical. It is dishonest to knowingly choose a fake premise and inference.

Bishop Peter Libasci and Bishop Robert McManus in the dioceses of Manchester and Worcester, USA, respectively, are the bishops where the religious communities of the St. Benedict Center are situated. If both these bishops did not choose the fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II, they would be Feeneyite on EENS and Vatican Council II, like the religious community in New Hampshire. If Cardinal Luiz Ladaria Prefect of the CDF and Archbishop Augustine di Noia, Secretary, CDF, chose the rational premise they too would be affirming Magisterial Documents like Brother Andre Marie micm, Prior at the St. Benedict Center, NH. They would be Feeneyite. - Lionel Andrades

__________________________________________

MARCH 19, 2023

Feast of St.Joseph today : protector of the Catholic Church and destroyer of heresies

  

FUORI DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA 

NON C’E SALVEZZA

(OUTSIDE THE CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION)

GIOV.3:5, MC.16:16

(JOHN 3:5, MARK 16:16)

CONCILIO VATICANO II (AG7/LG14)

(VATICAN COUNCIL II (Ad Gentes 7/ Lumen Gentes 14)

CATECHISMO DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA (846)

(CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH 846)

CATECHISMO DEL TRENTO, CATECHISMO DEL PAPA PIO X,

(CATECHISM OF TRENT, CATECHISM OF POPE PIUS X)

CONCILIO LATERANO (1215), CONCILIO DI FIRENZE (1442)

(FOURTH LATERAN COUNCIL (1215), COUNCIL OF FLORENCE (1442))

Name: Lionel Andrades

https://twitter.com/AndradesLionel

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Blog: eucharistandmission ( Lionel’s blog).               

 March 19, 2023 Feast day of St. Joseph

P.S: THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE (BOD), BAPTISM OF BLOOD(BOB) AND BEING SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE (I.I) ARE ALWAYS HYPOTHETICAL AND PHYSICALLY INVISIBLE CASES. SO THEY DO NOT CONTRADICT THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS (EENS).

THE BOD, BOB AND I.I ARE  NOT KNOWN PEOPLE IN PERSONAL CASES. THERE ARE NO PHYSICALLY VISIBLE CASES OF BEING SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE.SO THEY ARE NOT OBJECTIVE EXCEPTIONS FOR THE DOGMA EENS IN 1965-2023.

AD GENTES 7 AND LUMEN GENTIUM 14 SUPPORT THE DOGMA EENS .LG 8,14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 ETC ARE NOT PRACTICAL EXCEPTIONS FOR  AG 7/ LG 14 AND THE DOGMA EENS. THE COUNCIL HAS THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY WITH THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS, THE ATHANASIUS CREED AND THE CATECHISM OF POPE PIUS X ( 24Q,27Q).