Pope Francis does not accept the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) and neither do Michael Voris and Michael Lofton. It is the same for Catholic Answers, EWTN and the National Catholic Register. There is no denial from them.

 

Pope Francis does not accept the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) and neither do Michael Voris and Michael Lofton. It is the same for Catholic Answers, EWTN and the National Catholic Register. There is no denial from them. Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, without the Boston Heresy, does not contradict these Councils, on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). 

They all interpret the Council irrationally and then project Vatican Council II as a break with the Fourth Lateran Council and the Council of Florence.This is heresy and schism. There is no denial from them, I repeat.

Father Federico Montani, the SSPX priest from Albano, Italy, who offers the Latin Mass on Sunday mornings at the SSPX chapel in Rome said he affirms the past Council on EENS. But he rejects Vatican Council II. He means he rejects Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally. Pope Francis, Michael Voris, Michael Lofton, EWTN, Catholic Answers, NCR etc.accept Vatican Council II (irrational). The result has to be heresy and schism. 

Even I reject Vatican Council II (irrational). Since it would contradict the past Councils on EENS.

 I affirm Vatican Council II only rationally. There is no Boston Heresy. There is no conflict them with the past Councils on EENS. Vatican Council II supports the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed, the Catechisms and the rest of Tradition. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, YUR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are hypothetical cases only. This is interpreting Vatican Council II rationally. It is simple. - Lionel Andrades