Michael Voris and Michael Lofton agree with me. Pope Francis is in heresy and schism since he rejects the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) and he interprets Vatican Council II irrationally, as do Voris, Lofton and the SSPX.

 

Michael Voris and Michael Lofton agree with me. Pope Francis is in heresy and schism since he rejects the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) and he interprets Vatican Council II irrationally, as do Voris, Lofton and the SSPX.

They chose to reject Church teachings and  he past Magisterium to please the political Left.

They have to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II,  as being only hypothetical cases. Then Vatican Council II is no more a break with Tradition.But they do not do this.

The Catholic Church is once again clear on the salvation dogma and doctrines. There is coherence with the past and no more confusion. We have a discovery. The Boston Heresy has been identified and can now be eliminated. The exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church before and after Vatican Council II is the same.

If Pope Francis and the CDF choose to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition it means they are choosing the Boston Heresy, to produce a rupture. They can correct this mistake.

If the secular Government Ministries of Education in Europe,  interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the past, they too have to be corrected and so also the leftist media, Reuters, AP etc..

In the USA, the New York Times must correct its reports on Vatican Council II. Since the Council, according to the new discovery, now supports the Council of Florence and the Fourth Lateran Council. There is no more a rupture with the popes and saints of the Middle Ages.  - Lionel Andrades