The issue still is that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani and Pope Paul VI chose the irrational one. To repeat it today , after being informed, is unethical. It is not Catholic.

 

Lefebvrist blogs  still interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. It is the same with Fr. Thomas J.Weinandy and the conservative media. So they are vague on Vatican Council II and confusing in their rejection of Archbishop Vigano.

To avoid the schism charge the media associated with Roberto dei Mattei announces that they accept Vatican Council II (irrational) and they also accept Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez’s irrational interpretation of the Council and Catechism.This is a rupture with the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal.This is not traditional.

None of them  choose Vatican Council II ( rational) and so also the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athamasius Creed. They are politically correct with the Left, which opposes Tradition.

So the the Latin Mass community is further divided. They do not support Archbishop Vigano even on Vatican Council II. 

There is no mention of the issue on MessainLatino. The SSPX website has distanced itself. Peter Kwasniewski is churning out the same old stuff.

The issue still is that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani and Pope Paul VI chose the irrational one. To repeat it today , after being informed, is unethical. It is not Catholic.

-Lionel Andrades