The excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
were political excommunications of the Left. The Jesuit priest was correct when
he said there were no literal and visible cases of the baptism of desire. So
how could there be exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus? He was following the three Church Councils which did not mention any exceptions.
Archbishop Lefebvre was correct when he rejected Vatican Council II
interpreted irrationally with a false premise to produce a non traditional
conclusion and be an excuse for general liberalism in faith and morals.
The popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith did not
tell him that the Council could be interpreted rationally and then the
conclusion would be traditional.
They maintained the excommunication
For some 19 years, the excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney was
maintained. This was right through Vatican Council II .A new prayer book was
issued in Boston which rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It is approved by bishops conferences. We know
of ‘the reforms’ of Vatican Council II also based upon the irrational interpretation
of the Council-text.
Now the seer Gisella Cardia in Trevignon, Italy says she has not been
excommunicated. She does not deny the Creeds.
However her bishop, Bishop Salvi, and his Curia and Commission, are
interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and so there is a new version of
the Creeds, for them, which is politically correct with the Left. So he will not be
excommunicated.
- Lionel Andrades
Posts
