Wednesday, June 12, 2024

Pope Francis has simply to announce that there are no literally known cases of the baptism of desire etc and he becomes Magisterial on Vatican Council

 

FEBRUARY 27, 2023











Pope Francis simply has to interpret the BOD, BOB and I.I as not being exceptions to EENS : heresy and sacrilege end (Graphics )

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/pope-francis-simply-has-to-interpret.html



MARCH 6, 2023



It is like watering the roots of a plant or tree. With one simple step, one action, the whole tree is nourished-branches, leaves, roots etc.In the same way by choosing the rational premise we return to the past in faith and morals, liturgy,. mission, ecclesiology etc

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/it-is-like-watering-roots-of-plant-or.html

Pope Francis, the cardinals and bishops are presently not Magisterial on the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms.They will be Magisterial when they interpret all Church Documents rationally.

 

MAY 29, 2024

Pope Francis, the cardinals and bishops are presently not Magisterial on the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms.They will be Magisterial when they interpret all Church Documents rationally.

 

Pope Francis, the cardinals and bishops are presently not Magisterial on the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms.They will be Magisterial when they interpret all Church Documents rationally.

- Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/05/pope-francis-cardinals-and-bishops-are.html


 MAY 29, 2024

The perennial Magisterium of the Catholic Church has not changed. All we have to do is interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc, as being hypothetical cases. We then return to the apostolic ecclesiology of the Church. This was the understanding of the Church Fathers.

 

The perennial Magisterium of the Catholic Church has not changed. All we have to do is interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc, as being hypothetical cases. We then return to the apostolic ecclesiology of the Church. This was the understanding of the Church Fathers.

We go back to the ecclesiology of the old Roman Missal simply by interpreting LG 8 etc rationally. This is not just my opinion. Anyone can test it out.- Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/05/the-perennial-magisterium-of-catholic.html




MAY 29, 2024

In Heaven there are only Catholics (AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845,846, 1257 etc). This is why it is important that the Government be Catholic.

 

In Heaven there are only Catholics (AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845,846, 1257 etc). This is why it is important that the Government be Catholic.There must be a non separation of Church and State. There was no separation of Church and States at the time of the Papal States in Europe. The political Left today represents Satan (homosexual unions, abortion, pornography etc). So there must be a separation of the Catholic State and the Satanic State, which leads people to Hell-fires. 

In Italy the Partito Democratico is not Catholic. Those who vote for it commit a mortal sin. Melloni and Salvini too will support the pro-abortion law 194 and the LGBT agenda. The lesser of two evils is still evil.

-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/05/in-heaven-there-are-only-catholics-ag-7.html

MAY 30, 2024

Vatican Council II irrational is from the Left. With Vatican Council II rational there is no liberalism.

 

Catholics must oppose the Left –even if it includes the pontiff. The Left is from Satan.

Vatican Council II irrational is from the Left. With Vatican Council II rational there is no liberalism.

- Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/05/vatican-council-ii-irrational-is-from.html

Eucharistic Adoration - Medugorje 11/6/2024

 

https://video.marytv.tv/watch/mOyqWRsgSUF?ctx=yDj3O1j6sO8,mP9bEiEsi5K

Whether they like it or not, the Vicar General and Auxiliary Bishops of Rome support me, when they interpret LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally

 

MAY 29, 2024

Whether they like it or not, the Vicar General and Auxiliary Bishops of Rome support me, when they interpret LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally



 


Whether they like it or not, the Vicar General and Auxiliary Bishops of Rome support me, when they interpret LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally i.e LG 8 etc are  invisible cases in 2024. We cannot meet or see someone saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance (LG 16) etc. So our conclusion is the same. Since our premise is the same ( invisible people are invisible). The Rome Vicariate becomes traditional. They lose their familiar liberalism.

-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/05/whether-they-like-it-or-not-vicar.html


GAMBETTI Card. Mauro, O.F.M. Conv.


Cardinal Mauro Gambetti, O.F.M. Conv., Archpriest of St. Peter’s Basilica, Vicar General of His Holiness for Vatican City and President of the Fabric of Saint Peter’s, was born on 27 October 1965 in Castel San Pietro Terme, Bologna.  After graduating with a degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Bologna, he entered the Order of Friars Minor Conventual.  After a year of novitiate, he professed his temporary vows on 29 August 1995, and his perpetual vows on 20 September 1998.  Receiving his bachelor’s degree in theology from the Theological Institute of Assisi, Perugia, he subsequently earned a licentiate in theological anthropology from the Theological Faculty of Central Italy in Florence.

He was ordained a priest on 8 January in Longiano, Forlì-Cesena, where in the Convent of the Santissimo Crocifisso he headed the office of youth ministry and vocational pastoral care for the region of Emilia-Romagna and, from 2005 to 2009, also that of Guardian of the Franciscan community.

In spring 2009 his confreres in the Bologna province of Saint Anthony of Padua, with jurisdiction over the convents of the Friars Minor Conventual of Emilia-Romagna, elected him their Provincial Minister, an office he held until 22 February 2013.  At that time, he was called to assume the role of Custos General of the General Custody of the Sacred Convent of Saint Francis in Assisi for the four-year period 2013-2017.  At the same time, the Bishop of Assisi-Nocera Umbra-Gualdo Tadino appointed him as Episcopal Vicar for the pastoral care of the Papal Basilica of Saint Francis and the other places of worship entrusted to the Friars Minor Conventual of the same Diocese.

He was elected President of the Intermediterranean Federation of Provincial Ministers of the Friars Minor Conventual in September 2017.

In 2017 he was reconfirmed as Custos General of the Sacred Convent of Saint Francis of Assisi for the four-year term 2017-2021, a role he held until 31 October 2020.

He received episcopal consecrated on 22 November 2020 in the Basilica of St Francis in Assisi, becoming titular Archbishop of Thisiduo on 30 October 2020.

On 20 February 2021 Holy Father named him Archpriest of St. Peter’s Basilica, Vicar General of His Holiness for Vatican City State and President of the Fabric of Saint Peter’s.

On 2 June 2023 the Holy Father has appointed the Cardinal Gambetti judge of the Vatican City State Supreme Court, with effect from 1 January 2024.

Created and proclaimed Cardinal by Pope Francis in the consistory of 28 November 2020, of the Deaconry of Santissimo Nome di Maria al Foro Traiano.

Member of:

·       Dicasteries: for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life; for Communication;

·       Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State.


__________________________________________

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/05/whether-they-like-it-or-not-vicar_30.html


_______________________________________


15.The Rite does not make a difference?

Once we are aware of the false premise,Pope Francis can create the Amazon Rite  and new rites, for the Mass.The  ecclesiology of the Church will not change.It will still be the same as the Traditional Latin Mass of the 16th century.


Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848 
 "Outside the Church there is no salvation"  846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:  

Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.
847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church: 
Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.
848 "Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men."
-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848 


 Fake premise

 Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.

 Fake inference

They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

 Fake conclusion

Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.










 


Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.

Rational Premise

LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.

Rational Conclusion

Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.

Continued

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/05/the-la-interpretation-superior-general.html


There is no denial from any of the Rome Vicariate offices under the new Vicar General too.

 

MAY 31, 2024

There is no denial from any of the Rome Vicariate offices under the new Vicar General too.

 

There is no denial from any of the Rome Vicariate offices under the new Vicar General too. Cardinal Mauro Gambetti ofm conv., agrees that hypothetical cases of LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II do not contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney made an objective mistake. It confused invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for EENS. So EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215)  was made obsolete. 

“Outside the Church there is no salvation” (extra ecclesiam nulla salus) is a doctrine of the Catholic Faith that was taught By Jesus Christ to His Apostles, preached by the Fathers, defined by popes and councils and piously believed by the faithful in every age of the Church. Here is how the Popes defined it:

  • “There is but one universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved.” (Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, 1215.)
  • “We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” (Pope Boniface VIII, the Bull Unam Sanctam, 1302.)
  • “The most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this ecclesiastical body that only those remaining within this unity can profit by the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, their almsgivings, their other works of Christian piety and the duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved, unless he remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church.” (Pope Eugene IV, the Bull Cantate Domino, 1441.)https://catholicism.org/outside-the-church-there-is-no-salvation

The Dominicans and Franciscans  held the strict interpretation of EENS which today is not contradicted by Vatican Council II (rational/Feeneyite) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (rational/Feeneyite). So are back to traditional faith and morals. 

NEW MORAL THEOLOGY OBSOLETE

The new mortal theology and new concept of mission and evangelization is based upon Vatican Council II (irrational/Cushingite). There is no denial from the Vicar General of the offices of the Auxiliary bishops. Neither has there been any denial over the year from Fr. Paulo Boumis, the Parish Priest of Sant Agapito, Prenistina, Rome.

-Lionel Andrades


 MAY 30, 2024

Whether they like it or not, the Vicar General and Auxiliary Bishops of Rome support me, when they interpret LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/05/whether-they-like-it-or-not-vicar_30.html

MAY 20, 2024

Definition : fake premise, inference and conclusion and the rational premise, inference and conclusion.

 

The common fake premise is – invisible people are physically visible in 2024.

The common fake inference is – there are physically visible non Catholics in 2024 saved outside the Catholic Church without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

So the conclusion; the expected false conclusion is that Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church. This is a New Theology in the Church. It says outside the Church there is known salvation.

All this reasoning I call Cushingism. This process of bad reasoning is common among the Cushingite popes, cardinals and bishops.

The rational premise is – invisible people are invisible in 2024. Lumen Gentium 16 etc refer to hypothetical cases only.

The rational inference is – there are no physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in 2024 without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

The traditional and rational conclusion is that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. There are no objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence (1441), the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q ) and the rest of Tradition.We are back to the old theology of the Roman Missal.

I call this reasoning Feeneyism.

Feeneyism and Cushingism, for me, refer to a way of thinking and not the two well known persons, Cardinal Richard Cushing and Fr. Leonard Feeney. 

I interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance with Feeneyism. Cardinal Richard Cushing and the popes from Pius XII interpreted them with Cushingism.

I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 16 etc are invisible in 2024). Pope Paul VI and the popes who followed used Cushingism ( invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 14 are physically visible in 1965-2024).

In the 1920s and 1930's the Catholic Church was Feeneyite. Today it is Cushingite.

-Lionel Andrades

Mary, Mother of the Church






















Susanna from UK about Healing in Medjugorje

Even the Catholic police in Rome affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, like me.

 

Let me clarify that I follow Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church and so does everyone else who attends the Novus Ordo Mass. They accept Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation. They accept the Catechism of the Catholic Church 845,846 which says outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation; the Church is like the Ark of Noah that saves in the flood, and  God the Father wants all  to be united in the Catholic Church.

So I am supported by my Parish Priest Fr. Paolo Boumis, Sant. Agapito, Prenestina; Rome and the priests of the Missionaries of the Charity Brothers (Contemplative), Rome, where I have been living.


Even the Catholic police in Rome affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, like me.

So I am not saying anything new. For all of them, LG 8,14,1,5,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, refer to only hypothetical cases in 2024.It is the same for me. It is the same for the Auxiliary Bishops and Vicar General in Rome. It has to be the same for the President of the Catholic Bishops Conference in Italy and the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.Since it is common knowledge that we cannot meet or see someone saved outside the Church with the baptism of desire(LG 14), invincible ignorance(LG 16) etc.

So I hope I will not be discriminated in any way because of my Catholic Faith in Rome.

I go for Holy Mass in Italian and sometimes in Latin. I do not have a problem with the ecclesiology of the old Roman Missal which is not contradicted by Vatican Council II, interpreted rationally, i.e. Vatican Council II, Feeneyite and not Cushingite.

For me the exclusivist ecclesiology of the 1930’s is not contradicted by Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally. So I follow the Magisterium of Church Documents ( Creeds, Councils, Catechisms) interpreted only rationally. I affirm Tradition and interpret Vatican Council II and the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston, rationally. For me Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms, interpreted irrationally and so dishonestly, cannot be Magisterial.

- Lionel Andrades

JUNE 11, 2024

The baptism of desire is not an exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The 1949 LOHO made a mistake

 




JUNE 10, 2024

There is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the past ecclesiocentrism

 


JUNE 8, 2024

Vatican Council II is in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX

 

                                  

JUNE 5, 2024

The Council does not contradict Feeneyite EENS

 

The Council does not contradict Feeneyite EENS
- Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/06/the-council-does-not-contradict.html

JUNE 8, 2024

My parish priest Fr. Paolo Boumis at Sant Agapito, Prenestina, Rome, agrees with me. Vatican Council II when interpreted rationally supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which he should affirm in public. He understands.

 

My parish priest Fr. Paolo Boumis at Sant Agapito, Prenestina, Rome, agrees with me. Vatican Council II when interpreted rationally supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which he should affirm in public. He understands.



Since 1) Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) says outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation, all need faith and baptism for salvation (to avoid Hell) and 2) LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases for him in 1965-2024.

So they do not contradict Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 for him.

 Neither do they contradict the Catechism of the Catholic Church 845,846. 

So Vatican Council II for him is not a break with Tradition whenever he interprets it honestly.

He is a good pastor and a good person but he will not explain all this to the people. He will still tell the parish that Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition.

He now knows this is not true. He is telling a lie after being informed but he wants to be politically correct with the Left.

He does not want to tell the Jews and Muslims in the parish that the Church still teaches, as it did in the 16th century, that all need Catholic faith and the baptism of water for salvation. The Catholic Church is like the sole Ark of Noah that saves in the flood (CCC 845).

He does not tell First Communicants that Vatican Council II supports the Church of the Apostles and the Church Fathers, when they taught that there was exclusive salvation in the Church, Jesus’ Mystical Body. So in 2024 there has to be a return to traditional moral teachings which oppose the LGBT agenda. The new morality comes with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.

There no more can be liberalism to support the Eucharist being given at Mass, to the divorced and remarried. Homosexual unions (Fiducia Supplicans) can no more be supported with a Vatican Council II which is an alleged rupture with the 16th century Magisterium.

But he does not tell the people all this. He wants to maintain his liberal-left image with an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Pope John Paul II.

According to secular standards in Italy a priest is expected to be honest. Also according to Church law he cannot present a new version of the Athanasius, Nicene and Apostles Creed. 


I AFFIRM THE ATHANASIUS CREED HE DOES NOT

affirm the Athanasius Creed.

I interpret the Nicene and Apostles Creed rationally. 

I interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

do not use the false premise to interpret the Catechisms of Trent, Baltimore, Pius X, John Paul II etc.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church is not a break with Tradition for me.Since I choose the Rational Premise.I do not employ the false premise, inference and conclusion of cardinals Ratzinger and Schonborn.

I interpret Vatican Council II rationally so there is a hermeneutic of continuity with Feeneyite extra eclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Deposit of Faith and the theology popes and saints of the past.

My interpretation of Church documents is Magisterial. Since it is rational, traditional and in harmony with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church.There is no development of doctrine.

The interpretation of Magisterial documents with the false premise by Pope Francis is not MagisterialIt is political.It will be Magisterial when he chooses the rational premise."



 I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints" - Apostles Creed. 

For me the Holy Spirit teaches the Church today that outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation. This is not the teaching for Fr. Boumis.For him there is known salvation. Otherwise he would be affirming the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins - Nicene Creed

For me there is only one visible and repeatable baptism, the baptism of water. For him there are three or more visible baptisms. They are water, desire, blood, etc

I affirm the Athanasius Creed. It says:

Whoever desires to be saved should above all hold to the catholic faith.Anyone who does not keep it whole and unbroken will doubtless perish eternally...- Athanasius Creed.For me this Creed has not exceptions. For the Parish Priest there are exceptions.

- Lionel Andrades



https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/06/my-parish-priest-fr-paolo-boumis-at.html