Cardinals Fernandez, Zuppi and Gambetti , like the former
Vicar General and Jesuit Auxiliary bishop in Rome, who have been removed - used
Cushingism and not Feeneyism, to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism
of the Catholic Church. They were irrational, unethical, heretical and
political left.
The traditionalist priests at Ferrara were transferred
and their community closed down, because they allegedly helped the Lega
candidate Alan Fabri, to be elected Mayor. No specific reason for the transfer
was given or the closure of the community. Priests can only enter politics if
they support the Left.
Now the pope and cardinals have gone to the extreme,
in faith and morals, based upon Vatican Council II, irrational. The Council is interpreted by them with Cushingism and not Feeneyism.
Fernandez, Zuppi and Gambetti do not want to interpret
Vatican Council II with rational Feeneyism and so take the Church back to the
old morality. They would then be saying that homosexual unions are a sin. They would
have to oppose the abortion law 194.No divorce.No Holy Communion for the divorced and re-married. All this can no more be justified in the name of 'Vatican Council II?'.
The separation of Church and State is a leftist
concept.Since Vatican Council II is not a break with Tradition we can now work for the unity of Church and State like at the time of the Papal States. We can proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics, since there is no more liberalism in the name of the Council.
According to the Concordat the Church should have put forward
its candidates for the leftist European elections this month.The Church does have that freedom. The Concordat has to interpret all Magisterial Documents rationally.
Cardinals Fernandez, Zuppi and Gambetti have agreed
with me when I say that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with rational
Feeneyism. There is no denial from their offices. Anyone can ask them if LG
8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, refer to invisible
cases in 1965-2024.They will have to respond Yes. Then if they are asked if
these invisible cases contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the
Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors, they will have to answer NO. They
would return to Tradition. It would be the same with the SSPX.
But presently no announcement is being made by them.
The leftist daily newspapers, including Avvenire, are not reporting on this issue, even though it is a major story.
My parish priest Fr. Paulo Boumis at Sant Agapito,
Prenestina, Rome, knows that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism. So he really has to affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus like the missionaries in the Middle Ages. There is no denial from him. But he will continue to tell the parish that
Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition, the Church is liberal and open, and
the Middle Ages are obsolete for him. So he is not transferred or suspended
like the young priests who offered the Latin Mass and supported traditional
morality and got their Mayor elected.
Fernandez, Zuppi and Gambetti are not announcing that Vatican Council II (rational-Feeneyite) supports the traditional faith and morals of the young priests who were transferred at Ferrara. The Council no more supports the liberalism of the archbishop there. It does not support the former Jesuit Auxiliary Bishop who is no more at the Vicariate.
With Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) there no more is liberalism. Liberalism cannot be traced to the Council any more.The liberalism of the new morality, depended upon the Council interpreted irrationally, producing 'exceptions' for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Then it was said that if Vatican Council II can have exceptions for traditional ecclesiocentrism then this is a revolution in the Church. It is a new revelation. So faith, morals, mission, salvation and other teachings can also be changed - and even the liturgy can be changed.This was fallacious reasoning. Now we know that Fernandez, Zuppi and Gambetti must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally and return to the faith and morals of the young traditionalist priests.
- Lionel Andrades
JUNE 5, 2024
The Jesuit Auxiliary bishop in Rome who negotiated the transfer of traditionalists priests at Ferrara, has been removed it is reported.
The Jesuit Auxiliary bishop in Rome who negotiated the transfer of traditionalists priests at Ferrara, has been removed it is reported. Also the Vicar General in Rome has been changed.
The priests at Ferrara-Commacchio, Italy were transferred by the Archbishop of Ferrara,Giancarlo Peregro and the visiting Auxiliary Bishop of Rome. This was after Alan Fabri of the Lega was elected a Mayor there. The priests from Familia Christi (Family of Christ) can now demand that the Vatican Prefect for Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Fernandez, the President of the Bishops Conference in Italy, Cardinal Zuppi and the Vicar General in Rome, Cardinal Gambetti, also interpret Vatican Council II and all Magisterial Documents with Feeneyism and not Cushingism.
All the Auxiliary Bishops in Rome and the bishop in Ferrara must be honest and affirm Church teachings according to Canon Law.
The bishop cannot change the interpretation of the Creeds . This is first class heresy.According to Canon Law all juridical persons must be Catholic and affirm Church teachings.
-Lionel Andrades
MAY 20, 2024
Definition : fake premise, inference and conclusion and the rational premise, inference and conclusion.
The common fake premise is – invisible people are physically visible in 2024.
The common fake inference is – there are physically visible non Catholics in 2024 saved outside the Catholic Church without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
So the conclusion; the expected false conclusion is that Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church. This is a New Theology in the Church. It says outside the Church there is known salvation.
All this reasoning I call Cushingism. This process of bad reasoning is common among the Cushingite popes, cardinals and bishops.
The rational premise is – invisible people are invisible in 2024. Lumen Gentium 16 etc refer to hypothetical cases only.
The rational inference is – there are no physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in 2024 without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
The traditional and rational conclusion is that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. There are no objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence (1441), the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q ) and the rest of Tradition.We are back to the old theology of the Roman Missal.
I call this reasoning Feeneyism.
Feeneyism and Cushingism, for me, refer to a way of thinking and not the two well known persons, Cardinal Richard Cushing and Fr. Leonard Feeney.
I interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance with Feeneyism. Cardinal Richard Cushing and the popes from Pius XII interpreted them with Cushingism.
I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism ( invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 16 etc are invisible in 2024). Pope Paul VI and the popes who followed used Cushingism ( invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 14 are physically visible in 1965-2024).
In the 1920s and 1930's the Catholic Church was Feeneyite. Today it is Cushingite.
-Lionel Andrades
Mary, Mother of the Church
Cushingism produces division.
Feeneyism has unity with Tradition.Vatican Council II is Feeneyite ( for me).
Cushingism confuses what is invisible as being visible.
Feeneyism sees what is invisible as being invisible only. So we can interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
- Cushingism depends upon an irrational premise and inference.
- Feeneyism depends upon a rational premise and inference.
Since Cushingite Pope Paul VI, Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and others interpreted LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc; with Cushingism the conclusion was nontraditional. Vatican Council II became a rupture with Tradition. The dogma EENS had alleged practical exceptions. There was alleged known salvation outside the Church.
With Feeneyism Pope Paul VI and others would have been interpreting LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally. They, LG 8 etc, would simply be invisible cases. They would only be hypothetical always. So the conclusion would be traditional. Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with Tradition. The dogma EENS could not have practical exceptions. There was no known salvation outside the Church in particular cases. We could not meet or see someone on earth saved outside the Catholic Church without 'faith and baptism'(Ad Gentes 7).
Cushingism produces division.
Feeneyism has unity with Tradition.Vatican Council II is Feeneyite ( for me).
Cushingism confuses what is invisible as being visible.
Feeneyism sees what is invisible as being invisible only. So we can interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
Cushingism depends upon an irrational premise and inference.
Feeneyism depends upon a rational premise and inference.
APRIL 8, 2021
The Lefebvrists, Thucs and Feeneyites are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise like Bishop Steven J. Lopes is the first bishop of the Ordinariate of the Chair of Saint Peter and pastor to all its members and clergy in the United States and Canada. So nothing can be done by them regarding the case of Fr. Vaughn Treco
JUNE 5, 2024
It is the Cushingite bishop who needs to be excommunicated.
When Fr. Vaughn Treco’s homily was made public by Michael Matt’s Remnant media, it was not mentioned that the priest was in harmony with Vatican Council II (rational).The liberalism of Bishop Steven J. Lopes of the Ordinariate for the Anglicans comes with the Cushingism and not Feeneyism.We can interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds, for example with Feeneyism or Cushingism.Cushingism is irrational, heretical and schismatic. It is the Cushingite bishop who needs to be excommunicated. - Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/06/when-fr.html
Posts
