Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, before his excommunication is announced, must make it known on his blog that there is a
rational interpretation of Vatican Council II, which every Catholic must affirm.
So when he, Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez and all Catholics affirm the
rational interpretation of Vatican Council II, explained on this blog,
Eucharist and Mission (Lionel’s blog) they all return to Tradition. There is no
liberal-traditionalist division any more.
So there is also no more the need to go into
sedevacantism, since the Council and the pope become traditional. They do not
contradict the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. In this new scenario Archbishop Vigano does not reject the Council and neither Pope Francis, as the pope.
The responsibility now lies with Pope Francis and
Cardinal Fernandez to affirm Vatican Council II. Morally the Council can only
be interpreted rationally i.e LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc refer to
hypothetical cases,only.
- This is a new discovery in the Catholic Church, which was not known in 1965.
Now Cardinal Fernandez. Msgr. Kennedy and Archbishop Augustine di Noia at the
Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, and all the cardinals and
bishops in general, simply have to interpret Vatican
Council II rationally
In spite of what was said or done at Vatican Council
II (1965), or who held whatever belief later,conservative or liberal – when the Council today is interpreted
rationally the conclusion is traditional. There is no rupture with the dogma
extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of
Errors.
I repeat - when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally the conclusion is traditional.
When any one interprets the Council rationally the conclusion is traditional.
-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment