Archbishop Vigano has to ask Pope Francis to accept Vatican Council II and then he too will accept the pope. Ethically, the pope has only one choice, the rational option, which is traditional.

 

When LG 8 etc refer to invisible cases in 1965-2024 there are no exceptions in the Council-text for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).So Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 support the traditional teaching on outside the Church there is no salvation, in in harmony with the Catechism of the Catholic Church(845,846).So the Council is traditional.

Morally, this rational interpretation is the only option all Catholics have. 

When Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez mentions schism and excommunication for not accepting Vatican Council II ( irrational)  and Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano sedevacantism ( since he cannot accept Vatican Council II, irrational), they both are in ignorance. They interpret the Council irrationally and are unaware of it.

Archbishop Vigano has to ask Pope Francis to accept Vatican Council II and then he too will accept the pope. Ethically, the pope has only one choice, the rational option, which is traditional.  - Lionel Andrades