Thursday, August 2, 2018

Religious communities are not telling Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the CDF, that all this confusion cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit and so it is not magisterial.

What a theological mess is approved by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican for Catholics in general.First they approved the interpretation of invisible for us baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible examples of salvation outside the Church, so the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) was made obsolete.With an irrational premise, invisible non Catholics are visible, they got rid of the dogma EENS.This was deception. 1
Then in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission(Christianity and the World Religions and The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized) they rejected the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.Since they assumed there was known salvation in the present times, known non Catholics saved outside the Church with BOD, BOB and I.I etc.
They also questioned the traditional teaching on Limbo( The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized) since for Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr. Ladaria there were known to them  infants and adults who were saved outside the Church.
Invisible people cannot be exceptions to the dogma EENS. There would have to be practical exceptions for them to claim the dogma EENS was obsolete.
They still persist in this since there is no one to question them.
The ITC papers also malign the priest Fr. Leonard Feeney since he was saying, traditionally and with common sense,  that invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I were just invisible.
This was not bad enough for them.They extended the error to the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
The CDF then interpreted Vatican Council II with the same irrationality. Invisible for them cases of being saved in  LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc were projected as visible exceptions to the dogma EENS and the past exclusvist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
The CDF still approves this.No one is asking the cardinals and archbishops employed there to resign.This is the way the Catholic Church works for everyone.
Since there are known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church with BOD, BOB and I.I,LG 8 etc, they have changed the understanding of the Nicene Creed's, ' I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins'. Now it has become ' I believe in three or more new baptisms for the forgiveness of sins and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.They are BOD, BOB and I.I, LG 8 etc.
For the popes before the 1930's, to change the understanding of the Nicene Creed, would be first class heresy.They CDF Prefect would have been expelled.
So you can imagine the confusion among Catholics today since it is the CDF which is in schism with the past popes, affirming heresy with the use of an irrationality and enforcing it on the SSPX and on all religious communities, in exchange for canonical recognition.
In the past there was mission.It was understood that most people on earth were on the way to Hell.They lacked Catholic Faith, in the Catholic Church at the time of death.So the natives in the USA before Columbus went there were oriented to Hell.It was the same with the pagans in India and China.But now it is said that since there are 'known cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance' not everyone needs to enter the Church but only those who 'know', who are not ignorant of Jesus and the Church. This new doctrine ( only those who know need to enter the Church) based on the irrational premise( known cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance) creates a non-traditional conclusion(outside the Church there is known salvation) and theology( there is no need for mission any more). This error was protected by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
But Cardinal Ratzinger and those whom he employed at the CDF should have known that even with this error the Council can be interpreted in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS. In this sense nothing had changed.
Even with this error in Vatican Council II and the Catechism(1994), these magisterial documents can be interpreted without the irrational premise and the conclusion would be traditional, there would be no rupture with the past ecclesiology.No new theology was created or had to be created.Without the common error we simply return to the old theology, the old ecclesiology, the ecumenism of return and traditional mission doctrine.
But the CDF cardinals and archbishops and the two popes are not talking about this. They actually want a rupture with Tradition.
They have not created any process canonically so that they can be thrown out of office, at least, for their non professional activities.
Even at the secular level it would be judged that the use of a false premise, is a deception and a falsehood. It is unethical.It is malafide especially when the accused are informed and they persist in it.
Now Catholics in general have to affirm heresy and schism in order to be in good standing with the Church.This is evil. The New Code of Canon Law 1983 enforces this evil.

Cardinals and bishops are not asking the 'management' at the CDF to quit.Nor are lay Catholics telling them via the secular institutions,that their activity is unethical.Religious communities are not questioning the canonical recognition of  Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.j, Prefect of the CDF.All  this confusion  cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit and so it is not magisterial.
-Lionel Andrades


AUGUST 1, 2018

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j, Archbishops Guido Pozzo and Augustine di Noia at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,(CDF) Vatican should resign or go Emeritus.They have overlooked objective mistakes in Church-documents


AUGUST 1, 2018

Repost : I love Vatican Council II it has the hermeneutic of continuity with the past ecclesiology of an ecumenism of return


No comments: