EWTN, National Catholic Reporter, Crux, The Tablet, CNA, AP and Reuters need to clarify that for them LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. So they are interpreting Vatican Council II rationally.

 

EWTN, National Catholic Reporter, Crux, The Tablet, CNA, AP and Reuters need to clarify that for them LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. So they are interpreting Vatican Council II rationally. There is no deception. 

It would mean Archbishop Carlo Vigano could accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally and Pope Francis could do the same. So the both of them would be orthodox on doctrine and theology. There would no more be the need for sedevacantism. - Lionel Andrades