If Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally the Council emerges orthodox. So the pope is forced to be traditional. Then the Church is traditional once again.So the sedevacantist no more has a reason to reject the pope.

 

Archbishop Carlo Vigano is a sedevacantist and you support him?

I am pointing out that if Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally the Council emerges orthodox. So the pope is forced to be traditional. Then the Church is traditional once again.So the sedevacantist no more has a reason to reject the pope. He no more remains in sedevacantism because of Vatican Council II (irrational). with Vatican Council II ( rational) the pope becomes traditional like Archbishop Vigano. 

It would be the same for the sedevacantists Bishops Mark Pivarunas and Donald Sanborn. Bishop Williamson and the bishops he ordained would also have to review their position on Vatican Council II and Pope Francis.

 

Archbishop Vigano says he does not recognize the DDF and Pope Francis?

I recognize them.

However it must be pointed out that Pope Francis and the DDF not only interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally but also the Creeds. This is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II (Ad Tuendum Fidem).

There are many reports on the Internet over the years on this issue but the CDF/DDF has ignored them.

Those who change the interpretation of the Creeds are automatically excommunicated. They are not in communion with Jesus and His Mystical Body the Catholic Church.   - Lionel Andrades