Dearbhaím an Athanasius Creed agus Comhairle na Vatacáine II

Samhain 30, 2019

Dearbhaím an Athanasius Creed agus Comhairle na Vatacáine II

Is Caitliceach mé sa Róimh ag maireachtáil go síochánta mo chreideamh Caitliceach. Ní féidir liom iad a chur i bhfeidhm ar dhuine ar bith. Dá mbeinn ag súil le daoine eile a bheith fulangach liomsa mar atá mé. Dearbhaím Comhairle na Vatacáine II, a léirítear gan an comhbhrí bréagach. Dearbhaím freisin ecclesiam nulla salus breise (EENS), gan an neamhréasúnachas coiteann, mar a rinne an Magisterium sa 16ú haois agus na hAithreacha Eaglais.

Glacaim le cásanna hipitéiseacha de bhaisteadh dúil (BOD), baisteadh fola (BOB) agus glacadh le haineolas dofheicthe, mar ní amháin hipitéiseach. Níl siad ina ndaoine oibiachtúla agus ar eolas go pearsanta faoi láthair (2019). Mar sin, ní samplaí oibiachtúla iad de shlánú taobh amuigh den Eaglais. Ní féidir le daoine dofheicthe a bheith ina samplaí infheicthe de shlánú lasmuigh den Eaglais.

Mar sin ní dhéanaim tionscadal BOD, BOB agus I.I a mharú mar eisceachtaí oibiachtúla do Ghéinmhínithe 7, Comhairle na Vatacáine II, a deir go dteastaíonn creidimh agus baisteadh uathu go léir do shlánú. Gach.

Is é an norm do shlánú, domsa, creideamh agus baisteadh uisce, san Eaglais Chaitliceach. Is é seo teagasc na hEaglaise Caitlicí i gComhairle na Vatacáine II (AG 7), Catechism na hEaglaise Caitlicí (845,846,1257) agus eile cáipéisí maorga, a thuigim gan mearbhall a chur ar an méid atá dofheicthe, intuigthe mar chuspóir follasach, suibiachtúil.

Maidir liom féin, tugann an Eaglais le fios ina cáipéisí maorga, lena n-áirítear Comhairle na Vatacáine II, go bhfuil gach duine atá lasmuigh den Eaglais ar an mbealach go hIfreann. Áirítear leis seo iad siúd a bhfuil aithne acu nó nach bhfuil a fhios acu faoi Íosa agus faoin Eaglais agus faoin ngá atá le ballraíocht a shlánú .

Maidir liom féin, ní eisceachtaí praiticiúla do EENS nó AG 7 iad LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 srl.

Más rud é go sábhálfar duine ar bith ní bheadh ​​a fhios ag Dia ach dóibh. Ní féidir linn duine áirithe a mheas ar domhan agus a éileamh go sábhálfar é, mar eisceacht, chun slánú eisiach san Eaglais Chaitliceach.

Mar sin de, tá an chuid is mó de na daoine ar domhan dírithe ar Hell. Ó tharla go bhfaigheann siad bás gan creideamh agus baisteadh an uisce (AG 7, LG 14).

Tá Ad Gentes 7 luaite i dTacacism na hEaglaise Caitlicí faoin bhfo-theideal Lasmuigh den Eaglais níl aon slánú ann. Sábháltar iad uile trí Íosa agus an Eaglais. an Eaglais Chaitliceach le haghaidh slánú (AG 7). Is é an Eaglais ná Sacraimint an tSlánaithe. Caithfidh gach duine a bheith ina mbaill le creideamh agus le baisteadh, le haghaidh slánú agus níl aon eisceachtaí ann faoi láthair.

Tá rudaí maithe agus naofa ag reiligiúin eile (NA 2) ach tá neamhéifeachtúlachtaí, piseog agus earráidí acu freisin (Dominus Iesus). Ní féidir iad a mheas mar chosáin chomhionanna le slánú leis an Eaglais Chaitliceach. Tá a mbaill dírithe ar an Eaglais agus glaoitear orthu go léir a bheith ina gcuid den Eaglais Chaitliceach (CDF, ​​Fógra, an tAth .Jacques Dupuis, 2001)

Tá Comhairle na Vatacáine II ar aon dul leis an gcoincheap maidir le slánú eisiach, mar atá i St Maximilian Kolbe, Alphonse Ratisbonne, St.Francis as Assisi, Naomh Caitríona de Sienna, Padre Pio agus go leor naomh eile. Is é an Eaglais Comhlacht Mystical Íosa. Níl aon slánú taobh amuigh den Eaglais Chaitliceach (Eoin 3: 5, Marc 16:16, srl.).

Dearbhaím Creed Nicene agus Apostles a léirmhínítear le cásanna hipitéiseacha atá díreach mar hipitéiseach.Ba mhaith liom a bheith ullamh chun Gairm ar Chreidimh a dhéanamh. Dearbhaím an Athanasius Creed a deir lasmuigh den Eaglais nach bhfuil aon slánú ann.

Nílim i scátar leis an am atá thart agus tá sé ar EENS (Cantate Domino, Comhairle Florence 1441), éacúiméineachas tuairisceáin (a dhearbhaím le Unitatis Redintigratio, Comhairle na Vatacáine II arna léiriú go réasúnach) agus eaglasc eisialach (arna léiriú ag Lumen Gentium arna léiriú go réasúnach , gan an mbonn bréagach).

Ní sedvacantist mé agus ní traidisinéir traidisiúnta mé agus ní fhreastalaíonn mé ach ar an Aifreann Laidin. Is é eaglasta an Aifrinn, domsa, i ngach deasghnáth, mar an gcéanna roimh agus i ndiaidh Chomhairle na Vatacáine II. Freastalaíonn mé ar an Aifreann sa dúchasacht le heaglaisíocht na misinéirí sna Meánaoiseanna, a bhí ina thréimhse órga i stair na hEaglaise Caitlicí.

Ós rud é nach bhfuil aon slánú ann taobh amuigh den Eaglais agus nach bhfuil aon eisceachtaí ann don léirmhíniú dian ar EENS, domsa, níl ann ach Caitlicigh ar neamh. Tá siad ann le creideamh agus le baisteadh uisce agus gan peacaí marfach ar a n-anam.

Toisc nach bhfuil aon chásanna a bhfuil aithne phearsanta orthu, daoine neamhchaitliceacha a sábháladh lasmuigh den Eaglais, níl aon bhonn diagachta ann, don Diagacht Nua, don Éacúimeachas Nua, don Nua-Éiceolaíocht, don Soiscéal Nua etc.

Bhí mé gníomhach, le blianta fada, leis an Focolares, Athnuachan Charismatic, Neo Catechumenal Way de Kiko Arguello agus Léigiún Mhuire.

Tá cruinnithe idirchreidmheacha eagraithe agam chomh maith le cara agus sagart Proinsiasach, an tAth. Rasheed.

Sa lá atá inniu ann is cuid de mhisean a bheadh i gcruinnithe den sórt sin, domsa, agus deis chun an creideamh a fhógairt. Forógra a bheadh ann ós rud é gur mhaith liom an Soiscéal a fhógairt. Ní gá go mbeadh tiontú ann, a bhraitheann ar an duine agus ar Dhia.

Rugadh mé i dteaghlach Caitliceach agus baisteadh mé mar naíonán. Is lucht leanúna Teresa Avila mé.-Lionel Andrades

 NOVEMBER 30, 2019

I affirm the Athanasius Creed and Vatican Council II

I am a Catholic in Rome peacefully living my Catholic beliefs. I do not force them on anyone.So I would expect others to be tolerant of me as I am of them. I affirm Vatican Council II, interpreted  without the common false premise. I also affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), without the common irrationality, as did the Magisterium in the 16th century and the Church Fathers.

I accept hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB)and being saved in invincible ignorance, as being just hypothetical. They are not objective and personally known people in the present times(2019). So they are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church.Invisible people cannnot be visible examples of salvation outside the Church.

So I do not project BOD,BOB and I.I as objective exceptions to Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II, which says all need faith and baptism for salvation. All.

The norm for salvation, for me, is faith and the baptism of water, in the Catholic Church.This is the teaching of the Catholic Church in Vatican Council II(AG 7), Catechism of the Catholic Church(845,846,1257) and other magisterial documents, which I interpret without confusing what is invisible as being visible, implicit as being explicit, subjective as being objective.

For me the Church indicates in its magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II, that all who are outside the Church are on the way to Hell.This includes those who know or do not know about Jesus and the Church and the necessity of membership for salvation.

For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not practical exceptions to EENS or AG 7.

If anyone is saved they would only be known to God. We cannot judge a particular person on earth and claim he or she will be saved , as an exception, to exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

So for me, most people on earth are oriented to Hell.Since they die without faith and the baptism of water(AG 7, LG 14).

Ad Gentes 7 is quoted in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the sub-title Outside the Church there is no salvation.All who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church.This does not contradict the teaching on all needing to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation (AG 7).The Church is the Sacrament of salvation.All need to become members with faith and baptism, for salvation and there are no exceptions in the present times.

Other religions have good and holy things(NA 2) but they also have inefficiencies, superstition and errors ( Dominus Iesus). They cannot be considered equal paths to salvation with the Catholic Church.Their members are oriented to the Church and are all called to become a part of the Catholic Church.(CDF, Notification,Fr.Jacques Dupuis,2001)

Vatican Council II is in harmony with the concept of exclusive salvation, as held by St. Maximilian Kolbe, Alphonse Ratisbonne, St.Francis of Assisi, St. Catherine of Sienna, Padre Pio and numerous other saints.The Bible tells us that the Catholic Church is the Mystical Body of Jesus.Outside of the Catholic Church there is no salvation( John 3:5, Mark 16:16 etc).

I affirm the Nicene and Apostles Creed interpreted with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical.I would be ready to make a Profession of Faith.I affirm the Athanasius Creed which  says outside the Church there is no salvation.

I am not in schism with the past popes on EENS( Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441),an ecumenism of return( which I affirm with Unitatis Redintigratio, Vatican Council II interpreted rationally) and an exclusivist ecclesiology( supported by Lumen Gentium interpreted rationally , without the false premise).

I am not a sedevacantist and nor am I a traditionalist who only attends the Latin Mass. The ecclesiology of the Mass, for me, in all rites, is the same before and after Vatican Council II. I attend Mass in the vernacular with the ecclesiology of the missionaries of the Middle Ages, which was a golden period in the history of the Catholic Church.

Since there is no known salvation outside the Church and there are no known exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS, for me, there are only Catholics in Heaven.They are there with faith and the baptism of water and without mortal sins on their soul.

With there being no personally known cases, of non Catholics saved outside the Church, there is no theological basis, for the New Theology, New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology, New Evangelisation etc.

I have been active , for many years, with the Focolares, Charismatic Renewal, Neo Catechumenal Way of Kiko Arguello and the Legion of Mary.

I have organized inter faith meetings along with a Franciscan friend and priest, Fr. Rasheed.
 Today such meetings would be a part of mission, for me, and an opportunity to proclaim the faith.I would tolerate the views of others. It would be a proclamation since I like to proclaim the  Gospel.Not necessarily expecting a conversion, which  depends upon the person and God.
I was born in a Catholic family and was baptised as an infant. I am a fan of Teresa of Avila.  -Lionel Andrades