Wednesday, June 27, 2018

Repost : Without the Richard Cushing Error Archbishop Vincent Nichols would have to say all the Muslims in London need to convert into the Church for salvation

 JULY 6, 2013

Without the Richard Cushing Error Archbishop Vincent Nichols would have to say all the Muslims in London need to convert into the Church for salvation

Vatican Council II is in perfect agreement with St.Robert Bellarmine and the Jesuit missionaries when the Cushing premise is not used.
The Richard Cushing Error is a major cause of liberalism in faith and morals in the Archdiocese of Westminster.
Contrary to the websites of the Archdiocese of Westminster and the Conference of Catholic Bishops of England and Wales, the Catholic Church still teaches that all Muslims and other non Catholics are on the path to Helll.Their  religions are not paths to salvation. This is the official teaching of Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and other magisterial documents based on John 3:5 and Mk.16:16 in the Catholic Bible.
Pope Francis has already said that we cannot  find Jesus outside the Church., citing Pope Paul VI (Evangelii Nuntiandi) and St.Ignatius of Loyola.This is the Catholic Church not presented to Muslims who have dawah ( mission programs) in London, similar to Orthodox  Jews.
Vatican Council II (AG 7), like Dominus Iesus 20 (2000) and the Vatican Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuis S.J (CDF,2001)suggest, Muslim jihadis and suicide bombers are surprised at the time of death.
The Archbishop of Westminster Vincent  Nichols is still  holed in the bunker claiming the Archdiocese can can see the dead  now in Heaven, saved in invincible ignorance or with the baptism of desire.This was the fantastic canard used by the Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Richard Cushing to suppress the missionary Fr.Leonard Feeney.Cushing claimed every one does not need to enter the Church, as it was traditionalally taught, since there were known exceptions . As if he could name them!.
This was a false argument. 'We don't know anyone saved in invincible ignorance  and the baptism of desire for them to be exceptions ,' says Daphne McLeod in the Diocese of Westminster.Daphne is not a politician like the Archbishops.
In London, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Muslims and others need  Catholic Faith,  for salvation, mentioned in both Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(846).Catholics give the baptism of water to adults only when they have Catholic Faith.
At interfaith and ecumenical meetings in London, supported by the secular forces with a one world religion agenda, the Archbishop does not state that all Muslims in London need to convert to avoid Hell.Since they have Original Sin and commit mortal sins in this state and have no access to the Sacraments of the Catholic Church which save from Hell.
It someone did mention this to the Archbishop he may interpret Vatican Council II as a break with past .He could say not every one needs to enter the Church but only those who know about Jesus and the Church (as compared to those who don't know). In England the Muslims are educated. They know. The participants at interfaith  meetings in London -know.
Whether a particular Muslim knows or does not know it, is not an issue.Since this is an issue which would  be known only to God. The liberals make it an issue by using the Richard Cushing Error. They interpret Vatican Council II as they are able to know who knows and who is now in Heave and - and are also visible exceptions on earth!!  
Of course the archbishop would not be able to judge any such case in particular! He cannot judge any person in London as being an exception to needing to convert to avoid Hell.Archbishop Vincent Nichols cannot name anybody who does not need visible Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation.
So we have the Archbishop ignorance about any such case and Vatican Council II (AG 7) supports Daphne McLeod  in her traditional understanding of the one, true faith (UR 3), of the 'new people of God'(NA 4).
At Regensburg , when Pope Benedict XVI asked what new thing did the religion of Mohammad bring , he was in agreement with 'the dogma', the 'infallible teaching mentioned by Pope Pius XII (Letter of the Holy Office 1949).Pope Pius XII supported Fr.Leonard Feeney on doctrine/dogma, which does not mention any known exceptions.Neither does Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis or the Letter on Fr.Leonard Feeney mention any known exceptions.
The leftist media propaganda in England and abroad, suggest Pope Pius XII made an objective , factual error by indirectly assuming that the baptism of desire etc were known to us. They claim that invincible ignorance(LG 16), seeds of the Word (AG 11) etc are  explicit and visible for us for them to be exceptions to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney, who was excommunicated for disobedience and not heresy.This is  the Richard Cushing Error.It is  the same error that Archbishop Nichols and other prelates hide behind for polictical reasons.
The bottom line is that Vatican Council II says all need 'faith and baptism' for salvation, the Catechism states  unde the sub-title Outside the Church No Salvation, that all need to enter the Church 'as through a door'(CCC 846) -and neither does Vatican Council II or the Catechsim of the Catholic Church mention any exceptions (invincible ignroance and the baptism of desire, seeds of the Word,elements of sanctification and grace(LG 8), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3) etc not being excpetions).
This creates a new perspective for Catholic mission there.
-Lionel Andrades
(First Saturday)

No comments: