Now I know that liberalism is not only heretical (rejection of the Athanasius Creed) but also schismatic (rupture with the 16th century Magisterium and missionaries on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Athanasius Creed, rational understanding of the Nicene Creed, traditional mission based upon ecclesiocentrism etc). It is based uppon Vatican Council II irrational

 

Liberalism is a sin, was the title of a book I read a long time back. And I agreed with the author. But at that time I did not know that the wide-spread liberalism in the Church was caused by Vatican Council II and the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston, both interpreted irrationally. I did not know that the Council could be interpreted rationally. Now I know that liberalism is not only heretical (rejection of the Athanasius Creed) but also schismatic (rupture with the 16^th century Magisterium and missionaries on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Athanasius Creed, rational understanding of the Nicene Creed, traditional mission based upon ecclesiocentrism etc).It is based upon Vatican Council II, irrationally.

So when Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Cardinal Raymond Burke, Cardinal Robert Sarah and other conservatives say that Lumen Gentium 16 is an exception for the Athanasius Creed it is heresy and schism. It is the same mistake made by Bishop Robert Barron, Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and Archbishop-elect John Joseph Kennedy.

For me Lumen Gentium 16 is a hypothetical case. It refers to an invisible case in 1949-2024.So it is not an exception for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF/Holy Office) made an objective mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.

But this was not known to me some 20 or 25 years back. - Lionel Andrades