Children
at First Holy Communion and Confirmation classes and Religion class in Catholic
schools, are not taught to affirm the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with no exceptions, since cardinals and
bishops do not want to be laicized. It is obligatory for all to interpret Lumen
Gentium 16 as a rupture with EENS opening the door for liberalism.
Children
at First Holy Communion and Confirmation classes and Religion class in Catholic
schools, are no more taught that there is exclusive salvation in the
Catholic Church since cardinals, like Burke, Sarah and Muller interpret
invisible cases of Lumen Gentium 16 etc, as being visible cases of being saved
in invincible ignorance and visible exceptions in 1965-2024 for the dogma
outside the Church there is no salvation (Council of Florence 1442 etc).
So
John Henry Weston in his reports/petitions on Archbishop Carlo Vigano, will not
state that Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and Archbishop-elect John Joseph
Kennedy are in public heresy and schism for assuming that hypothetical and invisible
cases, like Lumen Gentium 16 etc, are objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed,
which says all need to be Catholic for salvation from Hell. Westen, like the
cardinals and bishops will not affirm the Athanasius Creed. So he is approved
by the political Left. Meanwhile Weston and the cardinals and bishops allow the
whole Church to continue in error while they protect their interests.
The
cardinals and bishops do not want to be laicized so they allow Catholic
children to be taught error. Even excommunicated bishop Richard Williamson (
excommunicated by Pope Benedict XVI for not accepting the ADL concept of the
Holocaust), will not say that LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican
Council II, do not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS. Archbishop
Marcel Lefebvre, Plineo Correa D’Oliveira, Michael Davis and Romano Amerio made
a factual mistake.
Roberto
dei Mattei and the web-blog Rorate Caeili, do not support children being taught
that there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church as it was done throughout
history before 1949. Since Lumen Gentium 16 is a rupture with the dogma EENS for them.
Mattei is still selling his book on Vatican Council II, in which he interprets
the Council as a break with Tradition. This is unethical. He is telling a lie
and the money is flowing in.
I
am not a liberal like Mattei and the others. Lumen Gentium 16 is not an
exception for EENS for me.
I
avoid the Great Vatican Council II Hoax. At the Sacred Heart Major Seminary in
Detroit all the professors have to accept the error in the 1949 Letter of the
Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. It projected invisible cases of the
baptism of desire as being objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. So Robert
Fastiggi, Ralph Martin and others there, have to interpret Lumen Gentium 16 as a
break with the past ecclesiocentrism, to keep their teaching job.
Even the sedevacantists bishops Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas and Peter and Michael Dimond at the Holy Family Monastery interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition. So they approved by the Zionists. There maintain their tax exempt status on donations. -Lionel Andrades
Posts
