An
Only the Catholic Church social group with small placards (what is permissible)
could stand at St. Peter’s, about 12 of them. The message could be ‘Justice for
Vigano’, ‘Kennedy interprets Vatican Council II only irrationally – no denial
from the DDF’.
The
group can be photographed with the I-phone or video filmed. The photo/video can
be posted on social media.
An
appeal can be made to Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez to interpret Vatican
Council II honestly. He must then admit it that Pope Francis and the College of
Cardinals and bishops must do the same. Otherwise they will continue to be in public heresy and in schism with the Magisterium
over the centuries. Their theology (outside the Church there is no known
salvation) and new doctrines (there are known exceptions for the dogma extra eccleiam nulla salus(EENS) and
the Athanasius Creed) is not Apostolic and part of the Deposit of the Faith.
They contradict the Church Fathers.Over the centuries they did not interpret the baptism of desire as being physically visible cases. They are invisble. This is common sense.
The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, use a false premise i.e. invisible cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14) are physically visible in 2024. So LG 14 is a practical exception for EENS and the past teaching of the Church on exclusive salvation.
This
approach can be used in front of the offices of the cardinals. An appeal has to
be made to the cardinals and bishops, to issue a statement. They must say that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2,
GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2024. They are always
hypothetical. So they do not contradict Tradition (EENS, Syllabus of Errors,
Athanasius Creed etc.). - Lionel Andrades