Saturday, August 3, 2024
Michael Russell O'Brien teen pilgrim at Medugorge and singer of Hail Mary Gentle Women.- Medugorje youth festival testimony.
Testimony - 2/8/2024
https://video.marytv.tv/watch/mcgAK4spcu7?ctx=yDj3O1j6sO8%2CmP9bEiEsi5K
In this heretical and schismatic condition Archbishop-elect John Joseph Kennedy from Dublin, Ireland will have his Episcopal ordination.
I
accept the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X. Pope
Francis and Cardinal Fernandez and the college of cardinals and bishops do not
do this.
I
accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted
irrationally, i.e. LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS etc are hypothetical cases.
They refer to invisible people in 2024. So they are not objective exceptions
for the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS etc. Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez
do not accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. They only accept
Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally.
I
have mentioned this over the years and there is no denial from any one. They agree
with. The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vaticaan supposts public
heresy and schism.
Pope
Francis and Cardinal Fernandez interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2; GS 22
etc in Vatican Council II irrationally and so there are exceptions for the Athanasius
Creed etc. This is unethical.
So
I affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism interpreted rationally and they
do not.
I
affirm the de fide teachings of the Church and they do not.
They
are interpreting the baptism of desire (BOD) irrationally. I do not make this mistake.
So they have changed the interpretation of the Nicene Creed ( I believe in
three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sin and they exclude the
baptism of water and I am not Feeneyite) and the Apostles Creed ( I believe in
the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church which today teaches that there is
known salvation outside the Church in the present times, visible people saved
without faith and baptism while before 1949 the Apostles Creed was understood
as saying the Holy Spirit teaches the church that outside the Church there is
no salvation, there is no known salvation.
To
change the understanding of the Creeds is first class heresy in the hierarchy of
truths. This is schism with the pre-1949 popes and Magisterial over the
century. They interpreted the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally and so
morally.
In this heretical and schismatic condition Archbishop-elect John Joseph Kennedy from Dublin, Ireland will have his Episcopal ordination.- Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 2, 2024
So they made him an archbishop.
Archbishop John Joseph Kennedy, a priest from the liberal diocese of Dublin, Ireland had a difficult job. He may have complained.
1.He had to defend Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
2.He had to defend the liberalism, heresy and schism produced by Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
3.He had to accuse Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano of being in schism for not accepting all this ‘thrash’ ; the liberalism which comes with the use of a fake premise and inference to interpret the Council.
4.He had to support Pope Francis who is not in communion with the popes of the past before 1949 because he accepted the objective error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office which was repeated in 1965 at Vatican Council II and he did not interpret LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally.
5.He had to support the excommunication of Archbishop Vigano who was going back to Tradition and not accepting the new liberal doctrines which come from Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally and not rationally…
So they made him an archbishop.
-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/08/so-they-made-him-archbishop.html
_____________________________________________________
AUGUST 2, 2024
The Vigano trial and excommunication must remind us that the Holy Office/CDF/DDF had excommunicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not accepting Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally
The Vigano trial and excommunication must remind us that the Holy Office/CDF/DDF had excommunicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not accepting Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
The Holy Office excommunicated Fr. Leonard Feeney in Boston for not interpreting the baptism of desire irrationally.
They have now excommunicated Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, for not accepting the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II as does Pope Francis.
The irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Cushingite version of Vatican Council II allows Pope Francis to break communion with the popes over the centuries. They interpreted the baptism of desire rationally and so in a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with no exceptions.
So the pope is not in communion with the popes before 1949 on the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc. This is heresy and schism. Since Vatican Council II, (with LG 8,14,15,16 etc), we now know, are invisible cases in 2024.
Invisible people cannot be visible exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors (ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church), Catechism of Pope Pius X (24 Q, 27Q).Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with this confusion and he wants Archbishop Vigano to do the same.- Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/08/the-vigano-trial-and-excommunication.html
I affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism interpreted rationally and they do not. I affirm the de fide teachings of the Church and they do not .
I
accept the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X. Pope
Francis and Cardinal Fernandez and the college of cardinals and bishops do not
do this.
I
accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted
irrationally, i.e. LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS etc are hypothetical cases.
They refer to invisible people in 2024. So they are not objective exceptions
for the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS etc. Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez
do not accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. They only accept
Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally.
I
have mentioned this over the years and there is no denial from any one. They agree
with. The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vaticaan supposts public
heresy and schism.
Pope
Francis and Cardinal Fernandez interpret LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc in
Vatican Council II irrationally and so there are exceptions for the Athanasius
Creed etc.This is unethical.
So
I affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism interpreted rationally and they
do not.
I
affirm the de fide teachings of the Church and they do not .
- Lionel Andrades
I have mentioned this over the years and there is no denial from any one. They agree with. The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vaticaan supports public heresy and schism.
I
accept the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X. Pope
Francis and Cardinal Fernandez and the college of cardinals and bishops do not
do this.
I
accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally, i.e. LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS etc are hypothetical cases.
They refer to invisible people in 2024. So they are not objective exceptions
for the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS etc. Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez
do not accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. They only accept
Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally.
I
have mentioned this over the years and there is no denial from any one. They agree
with. The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vaticaan supports public
heresy and schism.
-Lionel Andrades