Vatican Council II
...the sixteen magisterial documents produced by the council proposed significant developments
in doctrine and practice, notably
Lionel: There
were developments since Vatican Council II was being interpreted with a false
premise, with Cushingism. With a rational premise, with Feeneyism there is no
development. There is no liberalism. The Council is in harmony with Tradition.
______________________
·
Lumen gentium, the Dogmatic
Constitution on the Church on "the universal call to
holiness"
·
Lionel: It does not contradict the strict
interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It is the same with the
following Magisterial Documents which are in harmony with Tradition.
·
________________
·
·
Apostolicam actuositatem, a decree on The Apostolate of the Laity
·
Orientalium Ecclesiarum, a decree On Eastern Catholic Churches
·
Dei
verbum, the Dogmatic
Constitution on Divine Revelation emphasized the study of scripture as
"the soul of theology"
·
Sacrosanctum concilium, the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy to restore
"the full and active participation by all the people"
·
Gaudium et spes, the Pastoral
Constitution on the Church in the Modern World concerned the promotion
of peace, the gift of self, and the Churches mission to non-Catholics
·
Dignitatis humanae, a declaration on religious freedom
·
Unitatis redintegratio, a decree on Christian ecumenism
·
Nostra aetate, a declaration
about non-Christian religions
The council had a significant impact on the Church due to the scope and
variety of issues it addressed.[2] Some of the most notable changes were in performance of the Mass,
including that vernacular languages could be authorized as well as the Latin.
Background
[edit]
Biblical movement
[edit]
Pope Pius XII's 1943 encyclical Divino afflante spiritu[3] gave a renewed impetus to Catholic Bible studies and encouraged the
production of new Bible translations from the original languages. This led to a
pastoral attempt to get ordinary Catholics to re-discover the Bible, to read
it, to make it a source of their spiritual life. This found a response in very
limited circles. By 1960, the movement was still in its infancy.[4][5]
Ressourcement and Nouvelle théologie
[edit]
Main article: Nouvelle théologie
By the 1930s, mainstream theology based on neo-scholasticism and papal encyclicals was being rejected by some theologians as dry and uninspiring. Thus
was born the movement called ressourcement, the return to the
sources: basing theology directly on the Bible and the Church Fathers.
Lionel: The
Bible and the Church Fathers support the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla
salus.Vatican Council II when interpreted with Lumen Gentium 16 etc being an
objective exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, produces the New
Theology. Otherwise the Council has a continuity with the Old Theology, the
past exclusivist ecclesiology.
__________________
Some theologians also began to
discuss new topics, such as the historical dimension of theology, the theology
of work, ecumenism, the theology of the laity and the theology of "earthly
realities".[6] All these writings in a new style came to be called "la
nouvelle théologie", and they soon attracted Rome's attention.
The reaction came in 1950. That year Pius XII published Humani generis, an encyclical
"concerning some false opinions threatening to undermine the foundations
of Catholic doctrine". Without citing specific individuals, he criticized
those who advocated new schools of theology. It was generally understood that
the encyclical was directly against the nouvelle théologie as
well as developments in ecumenism and Bible studies. Some of these works were
placed on the Index of Prohibited Books, and some of the authors were forbidden to teach or to publish. Those who
suffered most were the Henri de Lubac SJ and Yves Congar OP, who were unable to teach or
publish until the death of Pius XII in 1958. By the early 1960s, other
theologians under suspicion included Karl Rahner SJ and the young Hans Küng
Lionel: The change came with
the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office which had an objective error and which was
not corrected by the popes from Pius XII to Paul VI. So the Council was
interpreted by Pope Paul VI and the Holy Office (CDF), by confusing invisible
cases ( LG 16 etc) as being visible examples of salvation outside the Church,
making the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus obsolete.This still is being
called a revolution and a new revelation in the Catholic Church.The mistake is not being corrected in the media or by the Vatican.
_____________________
Lione
In addition, there was the unfinished business of the First Vatican Council (1869–70). When it had been cut short by the Italian Army's entry into
Rome at the end of Italian unification, the only
topics that had been completed were the theology of the papacy and the relationship of faith and
reason, while the theology of the
episcopate and of the laity were left unaddressed.[7][8] The role of the Second Vatican Council in continuing and completing
the work of the first was noted by Pope Paul VI in his encyclical letter Ecclesiam Suam (1964).[9]
At the same time, the world's bishops were
facing challenges driven by political, social, economic, and technological
change. Some of these bishops were seeking new ways of addressing those
challenges. So, when Pope John announced that he would convene a General
Council of the Church, many wondered if he wanted to break down the
"fortress Church" mentality and make room for these tentative
movements for renewal that had been developing over the previous few decades
Lionel. The bottom line is that if LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are interpreted as being hypothetical cases only and so no more exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed, then the Council and the Church return to Tradition. It is the end of liberalism in the Church based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally.
The
interpretation of Vatican Council II in the Vigano schism trial was irrational
and dishonest. It was political.Also the College of Cardinals must interpret
Vatican Council II only rationally before they are eligible to elect a new
pope. This is the ethical thing to do. – Lionel Andrades
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Vatican_Council
SEPTEMBER 16, 2024
Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary
SEPTEMBER 17, 2024
Feeneyism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
SEPTEMBER 16, 2024
Archbishop Viganò EXCOMMUNICATED: Shocking Controversy Explored!
SEPTEMBER 15, 2024
The foreign embassies at the Vatican need to seek justice for Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano
The foreign embassies at the Vatican need to seek justice for Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano.An appeal could be made to the Russian, Italian, U.S and other embassies at the Vatican, to ask Pope Francis to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so honestly and so do justice for the former Italian nuncio to the USA.
Cardinal Fernandez interpreted Vatican Council II dishonestly during the trial of Archbishop Vigano and then accused the Archbishop of schism and excommunicated him.This is political. The foreign ambassies at the Vatican must call for justice for Archbishop Vigano.
The Vatican Office for Inter-religious dialogue is also misinforming non Catholics on Vatican Council II. Lumen Gentium 16 is not an exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Catholic Tradition.-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 15, 2024
It is Cardinal Fernandez who should be excommunicated for rejecting the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS, changing the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, re-interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and creating a false doctrinal rupture with the CDF before 1949.
It is important to reiterate that:
1.It is not obligatory for Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano to accept Pope Francis as the pope when the pope does not affirm Vatican Council II ( AG 7, with Lumen Gentium 16 not being an exception) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846,1257 with 847-848 not being an exception).
2.It is not obligatory for Archbishop Vigano to accept Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium 16 interpreted as visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Lumen Gentium 16 refers to invisible cases in 1965-2024.
3. Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and the other ecclesiastics at the Dicastry for the Doctrine for the Faith, Vatican, were not eligible to conduct the schism-trial, since they do not affirm the Athanasius Creed, which does not have any exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II. The DCF also does not accept the dogma EENS because of Lumen Gentium 16 being an alleged exception.This is public heresy. They have changed the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, when there is a reference to the baptism of desire.
The DCF does not have a continuity with the pre-1949, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which affirms the Athanasius Creed and the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
Cardinal Fernandez is in heresy and schism for not affirming the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms interpreted only rationally. It is the same for Pope Francis and the College of Cardinals.
It is Cardinal Fernandez who should be excommunicated for rejecting the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS, changing the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, re-interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and creating a false doctrinal rupture with the CDF before 1949. He has been supporting the objective and factual error of the popes from Paul VI to Francis and so there is a new liberal theology in the Church.
PUBLIC MORTAL SIN
It may be mentioned that for me, Pope Francis is the pope but he is in public mortal sin and so IS not in communion with Jesus and the Catholic Church. He is the pope for me, since there is no other pope. Mortal sins of faith take a person to Hell. He needs to end the scandal and receive absolution in the confessional.
I do not hold the position of Cionici, Barnhardt and other sedevcantists.
I also accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church but interpret them rationally unlike Pope Franics.- Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/09/archbishop-vigano-excommunicated.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment