Roberto dei Mattei has written a report for Rorate Caeili in which he cites St. Francis Xavier. But St. Francis Xavier held ‘the strict interpretation’ of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with no exceptions. Mattei and the SSPX bishops and Superior General do not do the same.

 

Roberto dei Mattei has written a report for Rorate Caeili in which he cites St. Francis Xavier. But St. Francis Xavier held ‘the strict interpretation’ of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with no exceptions. Mattei and the SSPX bishops and Superior General do not do the same.

Mattei supports Ukraine and the Italian Government, he criticizes Orban (for not being a Catholic), interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally, like the Zionists. He is politically correct with the Left and goes for the Latin Mass, whose ecclesiology is Feeneyite but he interprets it with Cushingism. His office is located alongside a church.

He is politically a liberal.

A liberal at the Latin Mass in Rome. He is liberal in his interpretation of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms. He interprets them with a false premise, unlike St. Francis Xavier. So the conclusion is nontraditional and liberal.

Pope Francis and the cardinals and bishops so the same as Mattei and so also the sedevacantist bishops.

SEPTEMBER 19, 2024

Papal Scandal in Singapore: The Error of the Equality of Religions — and the Faith of St. Francis Xavier

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/09/papal-scandal-in-singapore-error-of.html

MAY 20, 2024

Mattei is still selling his Cushingite book on Vatican Council II

 

Roberto dei Mattei still interprets Vatican Council II irrationally, like the Rome Vicariate, Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and the parish priest at the church where he has his office in Rome.

That he goes for the Latin Mass makes no difference?

He wrote a book on Vatican Council II which was Cushingite. He is still selling it.

There is no discussion or dialogue on this subject.  - Lionel Andardes

JUNE 24, 2021

For Roberto dei Mattei at the conferences with the Franciscans of the Immaculate Vatican Council II was only a pastoral Council and not dogmatic : we now know it is in harmony with EENS when interpreted without the false premise

 

Roberto dei Mattei wrote a book on Vatican Council II in which he did not avoid the false premise.The book was written with the fake premise. He could have avoided the error if he knew about it.There is no correction or apology from him. He continues to interpret the Council with the error instead of without the error.He will not affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).It's the same for Chris Ferrara,Michael Matt and the other 

Lefebvrists.